Skip to content

Zhengda.lu/incident 37187 #20051

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: 7.65.x
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

lu-zhengda
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

* resolve conflicts

* remove uptime
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (7.65.x@8567cf3). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
amazon_msk 89.50% <ø> (?)
cisco_aci 89.52% <ø> (?)
datadog_checks_base 89.29% <ø> (?)
http_check 94.26% <ø> (?)
kubevirt_api 82.75% <ø> (?)
mongo 93.09% <ø> (?)
mysql 89.50% <ø> (?)
postgres 93.37% <0.00%> (?)
riakcs 88.82% <ø> (?)
spark 93.50% <ø> (?)
sqlserver 91.46% <ø> (?)
tls 90.26% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

alopezz and others added 2 commits April 11, 2025 16:11
* Print debugging to figure out variable values on workflow dispatches

* Revert "Print debugging to figure out variable values on workflow dispatches"

This reverts commit f8e0985.

* Fix workflow dispatch by using github.ref_name instead of github.ref
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment