[AI-6534] Add Dell Powerflex Integration

[sarah-witt]

What does this PR do?

Adds an integration to monitor Dell Powerflex

Motivation

All assets will be completed in separate PRs.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI or with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 158 Tests failed

test_e2e_cisco_legacy_wlc from test_e2e_core.py     (Fix with Cursor)

Needed at least 1 candidates for 'snmp.device.reachable', got 0
Expected:
        MetricStub(name='snmp.device.reachable', type=0, value=1, tags=['agent_host:runnervmrc6n4', 'device_hostname:DDOGWLC', 'device_id:default:172.18.0.2', 'device_ip:172.18.0.2', 'device_namespace:default', 'device_vendor:cisco', 'snmp_device:172.18.0.2', 'snmp_host:DDOGWLC', 'snmp_profile:cisco-legacy-wlc'], hostname=None, device=None, flush_first_value=None)
Difference to closest:
        Expected tag agent_host:runnervmrc6n4
        Found agent_host:None
        Expected tag device_hostname:DDOGWLC
        Found device_hostname:None
        Expected tag device_id:default:172.18.0.2
        Found device_id:None
...

test_e2e_cisco_nexus from test_e2e_core.py     (Fix with Cursor)

Needed at least 1 candidates for 'snmp.device.reachable', got 0
Expected:
        MetricStub(name='snmp.device.reachable', type=0, value=1, tags=['agent_host:runnervmrc6n4', 'device_hostname:Nexus-eu1.companyname.managed', 'device_id:default:172.18.0.2', 'device_ip:172.18.0.2', 'device_namespace:default', 'device_vendor:cisco', 'snmp_device:172.18.0.2', 'snmp_host:Nexus-eu1.companyname.managed', 'snmp_profile:cisco-nexus'], hostname=None, device=None, flush_first_value=None)
Difference to closest:
        Expected tag agent_host:runnervmrc6n4
        Found agent_host:None
        Expected tag device_hostname:Nexus-eu1.companyname.managed
        Found device_hostname:None
        Expected tag device_id:default:172.18.0.2
        Found device_id:None
...

test_e2e_core_cisco_csr from test_e2e_core.py     (Fix with Cursor)

Needed at least 1 candidates for 'snmp.device.reachable', got 0
Expected:
        MetricStub(name='snmp.device.reachable', type=0, value=1, tags=['agent_host:runnervmrc6n4', 'device_id:default:172.18.0.2', 'device_ip:172.18.0.2', 'device_namespace:default', 'device_vendor:cisco', 'snmp_device:172.18.0.2', 'snmp_profile:cisco-csr1000v'], hostname=None, device=None, flush_first_value=None)
Difference to closest:
        Expected tag agent_host:runnervmrc6n4
        Found agent_host:None
        Expected tag device_id:default:172.18.0.2
        Found device_id:None
        Expected tag device_ip:172.18.0.2
        Found device_ip:None
...

View all

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 98.81%
• Overall Coverage: 88.69%

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: eb8bc69 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.81081% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.87%. Comparing base (b477b35) to head (eb8bc69).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sarah-witt]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4eb56e7612

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[dd-octo-sts]

Validation Report

All 20 validations passed.

Show details

Validation	Description	Status
agent-reqs	Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file	✅
ci	Validate CI configuration and Codecov settings	✅
codeowners	Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry	✅
config	Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml	✅
dep	Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible	✅
http	Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly	✅
imports	Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules	✅
integration-style	Validate check code style conventions	✅
jmx-metrics	Validate JMX metrics definition files and config	✅
labeler	Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories	✅
legacy-signature	Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature	✅
license-headers	Validate Python files have proper license headers	✅
licenses	Validate third-party license attribution list	✅
metadata	Validate metadata.csv metric definitions	✅
models	Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml	✅
openmetrics	Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit	✅
package	Validate Python package metadata and naming	✅
readmes	Validate README files have required sections	✅
saved-views	Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields	✅
version	Validate version consistency between package and changelog	✅

View full run

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: eb8bc69f7e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Don't seed alert collection at the current time

When collect_alerts is enabled for an existing PowerFlex gateway with no cache yet, this initializes the lower-bound filter to the agent's current time before calling /rest/v1/alerts?filter=last_updated ge .... Any active alert whose last_updated is earlier than that first check is filtered out and never emitted unless it is updated later, so users can miss pre-existing incidents immediately after enabling the integration. Consider fetching active alerts on the first run or seeding from an older/empty cursor and then advancing the cache from the returned alert timestamps.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[sarah-witt]

I think it's fine to miss preexisting alerts.

[maycmlee]

Created DOCS-14392 for review.