should omit comparison to bool constant, can be simplified to !q.limi… - #52
Open
day112 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
should omit comparison to bool constant, can be simplified to !q.limi…#52day112 wants to merge 1 commit into
day112 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ter.TryAccept() (S1002)go-staticcheck
day112
commented
Sep 5, 2022
day112
left a comment
day112
left a comment
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should omit comparison to bool constant, can be simplified to !q.limiter.TryAccept() (S1002)go-staticcheck
Author
|
should omit comparison to bool constant, can be simplified to !q.limiter.TryAccept() (S1002)go-staticcheck |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…ter.TryAccept() (S1002)go-staticcheck
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: