Skip to content

Conversation

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented May 9, 2025

Including the task_id in the data events (wrapped messages from run engine),
allows clients to filter messages to the specific task that they are
interested.

For instance, in the "submit task => start listening to events => start task"
exchange, it is useful to be able to ignore events received before the start
task fails due to another task running.

@tpoliaw tpoliaw force-pushed the data_event_task_id branch from 795db99 to 82f8c98 Compare May 13, 2025 09:50
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.84%. Comparing base (8260542) to head (f24d51a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #942   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.84%   94.84%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        2501     2502    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         2372     2373    +1     
  Misses        129      129           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tpoliaw tpoliaw changed the title Add task_id to DataEvents feat!: Add task_id to DataEvents May 13, 2025
@tpoliaw tpoliaw marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2025 09:57
@tpoliaw tpoliaw force-pushed the data_event_task_id branch from 82f8c98 to f24d51a Compare June 4, 2025 14:03
@tpoliaw tpoliaw merged commit ca33fa2 into main Jun 4, 2025
31 checks passed
@tpoliaw tpoliaw deleted the data_event_task_id branch June 4, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants