Skip to content

Conversation

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented Dec 2, 2025

Makes more sense for it to be there and makes it easier for it to share header
handling with the graphql endpoint.

and rename it to follow *_handler naming of the other two
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 37.02%. Comparing base (ab7efbf) to head (09f9281).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/handlers.rs 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
src/download.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/main.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #77   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.02%   37.02%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         443      443           
=======================================
  Hits          164      164           
  Misses        279      279           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

tpoliaw commented Dec 2, 2025

I think this and #79 are going to be conflicts but I'll fixup whichever one doesn't get merged first

@tpoliaw tpoliaw merged commit 3edd905 into main Dec 2, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@tpoliaw tpoliaw deleted the move-download branch December 2, 2025 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants