Skip to content

Conversation

@DiamondJoseph
Copy link
Contributor

On a fork, where secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN may not be set, the CI should be able to run

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.55%. Comparing base (88647fc) to head (e624472).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #83   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.55%   50.55%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         544      544           
=======================================
  Hits          275      275           
  Misses        269      269           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tpoliaw tpoliaw changed the title Prevent CI failing on fork Let CI pass when pushing to codecov fails Dec 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tpoliaw tpoliaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a problem given the codecov stuff is just advisory but why are we trying to run CI on forks?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants