Skip to content

Conversation

@sentience
Copy link

I dug up an implementation of radar graphs that was contributed back when g.Raphaël 0.4 was current, and have ported it to Raphaël 2.0 for my own purposes. See the two included test pages for examples.

All that’s left for it to be release-ready (IMO) is for g.radar.js to be minified, but I don’t know which JS minifier is used for this project.

Note: Like the Pie Chart, the current radar graph implementation only supports a single data series.

Silvan T. Golega and others added 20 commits December 10, 2009 23:11
* refs/heads/tec/master:
  Fixed bug when all Y values are equal.
  Fixed bug with recursion on large numbers. Added option smooth.
  0.4.1 Bug fixes
  The values are now numbered and can get titles in the legend
  naaming issue
  naming issue
  legend (labels)
  a simple sample for the radar graph
  a radar graph for g.raphael with basic interaction
radar chart itself is still not yet ported
per changes to radar graph for Raphaël 2.0
@rzurad
Copy link
Collaborator

rzurad commented Feb 13, 2012

Cool. I'll look into the possibility of integrating this into g.raphael releases past 0.5.1. The current priority for 0.5.1 is fixing bugs and adding some of the simple feature additions / bugs that other people have submitted via pull requests and fully documenting all chart types.

Once 0.5.1 is out the door, I'll want to start looking into the possibility of adding additional chart types. I just want to make sure that the current supported charts are fully tested and as solid as they can be before I start focusing on other chart types.

@rzurad rzurad mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2012
@tec
Copy link

tec commented Mar 19, 2013

I took this pull request, merged it with 0.5.1 and added some documentation in my master branch at tec/g.raphael. Should I file a new pull request or is there a way to add my commits here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants