Include model action fields in htmx requests

[dzarlax]

Summary

• include the local model action block in htmx requests so model_id/provider hidden fields are always submitted
• add a template regression assertion for the include selector

Tests

• go test -count=1 ./...

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@dzarlax, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 18 minutes and 6 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 82226435-d8df-42e0-b51f-2812ac68682d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9800357 and e35e717.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• internal/adminapi/adminapi_test.go
• internal/adminapi/templates/partials_models_row.html

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/model-actions-include-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e35e717fd6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Split htmx includes so model fields are submitted

With the htmx 2.0.3 version pinned by the Dockerfile, extended selectors are only recognized when the whole hx-include value starts with closest; #models-filters, closest .model-actions is treated as a normal CSS selector list, so it matches the filter form but not the local action block. As a result the hidden model_id/provider inputs are still omitted for Check free/eval/override clicks, and the handlers keep returning model_id required; split/inherit the includes so .model-actions is actually serialized.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.