Skip to content

Conversation

@ndkeen
Copy link
Contributor

@ndkeen ndkeen commented Oct 22, 2025

Remove the output preset modifier for one test that was causing trouble after moving to 128 default vertical levels.

[BFB] (except for the one test that now has a new name and will need baseline generated)

@ndkeen ndkeen self-assigned this Oct 22, 2025
@ndkeen ndkeen added Machine Files BFB PR leaves answers BFB Testing Anything related to unit/system tests pm-gpu Perlmutter machine at NERSC (GPU nodes) labels Oct 22, 2025
@ndkeen ndkeen requested a review from bartgol October 22, 2025 20:31
Copy link
Contributor

@bartgol bartgol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is BFB, but will cause DIFFs due to missing baselines, right? Maybe we should mark as non-BFB, and explain, so that it makes it easier to filter PRs down the road if when our tests break and we do bisection? No big deal though...

ndkeen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
…7823)

Remove the output preset modifier for one test that was causing trouble after moving to 128 default vertical levels.

[bfb]
@ndkeen
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndkeen commented Oct 22, 2025

Oh shoot, I missed your comment before merging to next.
Indeed it will require a generation of new baseline for that one test.
But I typically think of this sort of change as BFB, though I see the argument that it's NBFB for that test.

@ndkeen ndkeen merged commit 814f415 into master Oct 23, 2025
8 checks passed
@ndkeen ndkeen deleted the ndk/machinefiles/eamxx-remove-a-testmod branch October 23, 2025 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

BFB PR leaves answers BFB Machine Files pm-gpu Perlmutter machine at NERSC (GPU nodes) Testing Anything related to unit/system tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants