Skip to content

Conversation

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek commented Nov 25, 2025

Description of changes

This turns on the CMIP7 Carbon isotopes by default. It's answer changing for BGC cases that use Carbon Isotopes.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? Yes -- only with use_c13/use_c14 on

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Carbon isotope streams will resond to the CLM_CMIP_ERA setting

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No

Testing performed, if any: None, so far will do regular testing
Right now this is the same as the branch with b4b ciso changes in it
Will be adding the changes in a bit

lifang0209 and others added 30 commits May 30, 2025 10:13
slevis resolved conflicts:
tools/mksurfdata_esmf/src/mkagfirepkmonthMod.F90
…k_ctsm54_datasets

slevis resolved conflicts:
tools/mksurfdata_esmf/gen_mksurfdata_namelist.xml
…fdata_esmf

Include abm = 13 values when determining dominant abm in mksurfdata_esmf
Merge b4b-dev to master

slevis resolved conflicts:
tools/mksurfdata_esmf/gen_mksurfdata_namelist.xml
Merge master to alpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7

New tag alpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7.03.ctsm5.3.063
Update everything needed to make ctsm54 datasets.
Urban mesh was pointing to a 3x3min instead of a 0.25x0.25 file
…at_landuse

Add ctsm54 ne30, f09, f19 fsurdat/landuse files to namelist defaults
ekluzek and others added 15 commits November 21, 2025 12:16
Correct to one line from review.

Co-authored-by: Samuel Levis <[email protected]>
Correction from review.

Co-authored-by: Samuel Levis <[email protected]>
… as expected, add some clarification, and turn on stream isotopes for some clm6_0 tests
alpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7.19.ctsm5.3.082: Fix LII2 COMPARE_base_no_interp failures
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the cesm3_0_beta08 milestone Nov 25, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Nov 25, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added the enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability label Nov 25, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added science Enhancement to or bug impacting science non-bfb Changes answers (incl. adding tests) labels Nov 25, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board Nov 25, 2025
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Dec 1, 2025

Replaced by #3634

@ekluzek ekluzek closed this Dec 1, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board Dec 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability non-bfb Changes answers (incl. adding tests) science Enhancement to or bug impacting science

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants