post5.4: Use the correct C13/C14 atm ratio in the code more #3632
+27
−10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… in place of preindustrial values in the code from issue ESCOMP#3567
ekluzek
added
science
Contributor
|
I can review this, Erik. We may be more productive going through this together, or doing a functional test of the code (historical simulation) to see if things look as expected? |
ekluzek
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This brings in changes to use the correct C13/C134 atmospheric ratio more. I need a scientist working in the C13/C14 space to review this.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fiex #3567
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? Yes, when C13/C14 on for BGC simulations
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No
Testing performed, if any: Limited so far