Conversation
Based on Google Spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gFN9v5m7PDA4aprQZzeqqfkyFLaX1UYklru68KMVAZ8/edit?gid=0#gid=0
|
@ashepherd @mbjones Ones I added: |
|
Overall format looks good. While all of those listed are schema.org adopters, I am not confident they are all SOSO adopters per se. We point them at the SOSO guidelines, and some follow them closely, some less so. Should we have a column indicating that they 1) adopted SOSO specifically (true/false), and 2) comply with a specific SOSO compliance level (e.g., minimal, full, etc) that maybe we can check via the SHACL validators? (2) is hard, probably too ambitious. But if (1) is |
|
Ah ok, maybe we can get a student for a FUNding Friday to do that work. I added the DataoNE status and software columns to the adopters list too in case that's some proxy we can use? |
Based on Google Spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gFN9v5m7PDA4aprQZzeqqfkyFLaX1UYklru68KMVAZ8/edit?gid=0#gid=0
Curious if you like the format & mechanism for updating?