add GitHub actions for testing #92
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
daniel-jettka
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Ready for Review
to Approved
in Edirom Development
daniel-jettka
deleted the
ftr-36-add-github-actions-for-building-and-testing
branch
bwbohl
restored the
ftr-36-add-github-actions-for-building-and-testing
branch
bwbohl
deleted the
ftr-36-add-github-actions-for-building-and-testing
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description, Context and related Issue
This PR adjusts the tests "check-language-files" and "xqunit-tests" – which we already had in the old Edirom-Online repo – to the new structure of the Edirom-Online-Backend.
NB: Some xqsuite tests are currently failing due to some changes to the
getLanguageString(?) function. I wouldn't want to address this in this PR since I think this should be discussed separately.Refs #36
How Has This Been Tested?
I tested the ant build file and the two tests locally.
I could not test the Github actions since the relevant workflow is currently disabled. I propose to reactivate this workflow after this PR has been merged.
Types of changes
Overview