Implement our own LookupError

[vchuravy]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Your PR requires formatting changes to meet the project's style guidelines.
Please consider running Runic (git runic main) to apply these changes.

Click here to view the suggested changes.

diff --git a/src/utils.jl b/src/utils.jl
index c2dc83e9..f4980eb6 100644
--- a/src/utils.jl
+++ b/src/utils.jl
@@ -273,8 +273,8 @@ end
 function Base.showerror(io::IO, e::LookupError)
     print(io, "no method matching ")
     Base.show_signature_function(io, e.ft)
-    Base.show_tuple_as_call(io, :function, e.tt; hasfirst=false, kwargs=nothing)
-    if Core._hasmethod(GPUCompiler.signature_type_by_tt(e.ft, e.tt))
+    Base.show_tuple_as_call(io, :function, e.tt; hasfirst = false, kwargs = nothing)
+    return if Core._hasmethod(GPUCompiler.signature_type_by_tt(e.ft, e.tt))
         print(io, "\n(method exists but is not available in world age $(e.world))")
     end
 end

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

	main	0cee171...	main / 0cee171...
basics/make_zero/namedtuple	0.0543 ± 0.0022 μs	0.0555 ± 0.0025 μs	0.979 ± 0.06
basics/make_zero/struct	0.261 ± 0.0064 μs	0.261 ± 0.0068 μs	1 ± 0.036
basics/overhead	5.57 ± 1.8 ns	5.56 ± 0.01 ns	1 ± 0.33
basics/remake_zero!/namedtuple	0.236 ± 0.0073 μs	0.242 ± 0.011 μs	0.974 ± 0.053
basics/remake_zero!/struct	0.249 ± 0.0063 μs	0.234 ± 0.01 μs	1.07 ± 0.053
fold_broadcast/multidim_sum_bcast/1D	10.3 ± 0.36 μs	10.4 ± 0.52 μs	0.996 ± 0.061
fold_broadcast/multidim_sum_bcast/2D	10.3 ± 0.22 μs	12.1 ± 0.35 μs	0.848 ± 0.031
time_to_load	1.31 ± 0.0013 s	1.32 ± 0.019 s	0.991 ± 0.014

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results has been uploaded as an artifact at https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/actions/runs/19274222758/artifacts/4534799538.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 45.45455% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.90%. Comparing base (4fa1260) to head (0cee171).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/utils.jl	25.00%	6 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2772      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.92%   68.90%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          58       58              
  Lines       19861    19868       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        13690    13691       +1     
- Misses       6171     6177       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[oscardssmith]

why?

[vchuravy]

Because you can't throw a method error using only the type of the function?

[wsmoses]

could we add a test with this to make sure it doesn't decay again?

[oscardssmith]

@vchuravy ah, that makes sense then.