Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 19, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@rweber-esri
Copy link
Contributor

…atalogs

14636

  1. Description:
  • Makes sure catalog migrations are applied to Discussion Board catalogs
  1. Instructions for testing:

  2. Closes Issues: # (if appropriate)

  3. Updated meaningful TSDoc to methods including Parameters and Returns, see Documentation Guide

  4. Either ran npm run changeset or this change does not require a release.

  5. These changes have been verified by QA using a ?uiVersion that includes a PR-Preview of this branch and the v_req label has been applied to the issue.

  6. OD-UI E2E tests pass against these changes using a ?uiVersion that includes a PR-Preview of this branch

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d9d2edd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@esri/hub-common Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@rweber-esri rweber-esri force-pushed the b/14636-discussions-applies-catalog-migrations branch from 9e78a68 to fcbe720 Compare November 14, 2025 14:38
@rweber-esri rweber-esri force-pushed the b/14636-discussions-applies-catalog-migrations branch from fcbe720 to d9d2edd Compare November 14, 2025 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

@juliannaeapicella juliannaeapicella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@rweber-esri rweber-esri merged commit ff9c469 into master Nov 14, 2025
3 checks passed
@rweber-esri rweber-esri deleted the b/14636-discussions-applies-catalog-migrations branch November 14, 2025 16:38
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants