Skip to content

docs: add Papers with Code badges for LLaVA-OneVision - #1496

Closed
lorenzozanee wants to merge 1 commit into
EvolvingLMMs-Lab:mainfrom
lorenzozanee:fix/docs-papers-with-code-badges
Closed

docs: add Papers with Code badges for LLaVA-OneVision#1496
lorenzozanee wants to merge 1 commit into
EvolvingLMMs-Lab:mainfrom
lorenzozanee:fix/docs-papers-with-code-badges

Conversation

@lorenzozanee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

In scope

  • Add two PwC badges (eval=7144 NLVR2, eval=28575 CLIP-CC-Bench) alongside existing shields in README.md.

Out of scope

Validation

  • git diff --check | sample size: N=1 file | key metrics: no whitespace errors | result: pass
  • git diff --stat | sample size: N=1 file | key metrics: README.md | 2 ++ | result: pass
  • Manual README preview: badges render as live PwC SVGs and link to paperswithcode.co/paper/2408.03326

Risk / Compatibility

  • Documentation-only change, no runtime or API impact.
  • External badge SVGs are live from Papers with Code; no local asset change.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change)
  • New feature
  • New benchmark/task
  • New model integration
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)

@pufanyi

pufanyi commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thank you for taking the time to put this together. These badges look helpful for showcasing the LLaVA-OneVision results.

Since the rankings are specific to LLaVA-OneVision rather than lmms-eval itself, we feel they would be a better fit for the official LLaVA-OneVision repository. We’d also like to keep the top-level lmms-eval README focused on the evaluation framework as a whole, since it supports many different model families.

With that in mind, we’ll pass on adding these badges here, but we really appreciate the contribution and the suggestion.

@pufanyi pufanyi closed this Aug 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Verify evals on Papers with Code

2 participants