Skip to content

Conversation

@Niklaus-xie
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Niklaus-xie Niklaus-xie self-assigned this Nov 13, 2020
@Niklaus-xie Niklaus-xie changed the title add another switch to control (not merge this until at least Monday)add another switch to control Nov 13, 2020
if getting db members or not. Need to set to
True if SY does not modify at last.
@Niklaus-xie Niklaus-xie force-pushed the h3c-pike-if-sy-not-modify branch from 7124133 to 55566f0 Compare November 13, 2020 14:04
Copy link

@zhaoqin-github zhaoqin-github left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides batch adding, other operation also need to call this method. This config option will disable the optimization of all others.

If batch adding need it unique way to append member, it can write its own function and pass it via kwargs.

Copy link

@zhaoqin-github zhaoqin-github left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another problem is that batch adding is never optimized, so that its service payload will include all listeners and all pools and member under the lb.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants