Add fabric.configFolder system property to set mod config path
#1082
+14
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As the logic of the new `getConfigDirectory0` function is very similar to the existing `getModsDirectory0`, I abstracted them both into `getConfiguredOrRelativeDirectory`, which I honestly didn't name very well, which retrieves a path from a system property or, as a fallback, as a predefined path relative to the game directory.
Player3324
reviewed
Oct 8, 2025
| // a comma-separated list of mod ids to disable, even if they're discovered. mostly useful for unit testing. | ||
| public static final String DISABLE_MOD_IDS = "fabric.debug.disableModIds"; | ||
| // a path to a directory to replace the default mod config directory | ||
| public static final String CONFIG_FOLDER = "fabric.configFolder"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please move this next to the modsFolder property, probably above it
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Super quick implementation of the first/main part (i.e. not 'Further options') of #1081.
I'm not sure if this is worth writing tests for?