Fix errant “accept anything” handling of providers#162
Conversation
When `hasMatchingMediaType` returns `true` by default, it is impossible to have a catch-all provider, or even a sensible and predicatable error, when the response doesn’t have a content-type.
|
It would great to consider this as a "bug" and consider backporting these changes. Working with multiple formats and detecting an unsupported or errant format is impossible the way it currently is. |
|
Ok. I don't think this can be backported due to very likely compatibility issues: some users are likely to rely on default behavior. Timing-wise, either way I just released the last RC for 2.14 so this will have to wait until 2.15, unless there was a way to make it so that:
It might make sense to bring this up on "jackson-dev" google group since while description makes sense, I think I'd like others to voice their opinions. Especially considering that this setting has been there for past 8+ years or so... meaning I don't think it can be exactly obvious flaw. |
|
Wether or not it can be back ported or may be relied upon for current users is a debate to be had for sure, but I have to disagree with it not being an obvious flaw. The entire point of This becomes a big issue when supporting multiple formats. For example we support JSON and CBOR. As it stands if no media type is present, whatever format is queried first is assumed to be the format and you generally get a nondescript error. We added our own catch all (i.e. |
|
I am not arguing so much about it not being problematic. But from purely pragmatic viewpoint I am surprised no one else considered this problematic enough to report a bug. And I would be guessing that this is considered a "feature, not bug" by some developers who want defaulting and do not support multiple media types. Once again I am not arguing this is proper way to think about things (it is sloppy) but that change here would cause breakage for anyone relying on current behavior. |
|
@cowtowncoder Given that #194 was merged and to some extent tightens up this behavior. Is it time to get this fix in to? |
|
FYI... we use the variant feature quite a bit to switch between JSON/YAML/CBOR and in my experience it is the JAX-RS implementation that should be selecting a "default". This generally allows more nuanced decision making; additionally, major frameworks seem to already handle this. For example, Quarkus & Spring select JSON (by default or configuration) if no MB(Reader|Writer) returns In general, adding this modules just breaks all of that specialized handling because Jackson has effectively committed to handling "everything" in all of its providers. |
|
Another point of information your decision is, this isn't easy to fix, even when you known there's a problem. We handle this now but deriving our own YAMLProvider and CBORProvider like so (please excuse the Kotlin): @Provider
@Produces(WILDCARD) // Allow handling of suffixed types (e.g. `+cbor`, `+yaml`
@Consumes(WILDCARD) // Wildcard is not an issue when isReadable/isWritable return proper values
@Priority(Priorities.USER)
class YAMLProvider : JacksonYAMLProvider {
override hasMatchingMediaType(MediaType mediaType) {
// Check for application/yaml and `+yaml` and then let Quarkus/JAX-RS decide.
return false
}
}Unfortunately this doesn't work, after a bit of testing you will conclude you need two things
All in all, this can be quite a nuisance and hard to keep correctly working. Quarkus has had major changes to their Reactive JAX-RS that are tripped up by this and our code must adapt accordingly; thankfully proper testing ensures we are able to detect these problems. |
|
@kdubb Apologies for super-slow follow-up, but I am back and I agree with your assessment: change is desirable. So as to how/where to make the change, I think this should go in the next 2.x minor release, 2.19. So target branch should be 2.19 (easier to merge forward). So: would it be possible to create a new PR targeting 2.19, adding new If so, would be happy to get this merged & I can handle rolling forward to master/3.0. |
|
@cowtowncoder I'd like to pick this back up. If so, it is too late for 3.0? |
|
It seems this affects both jaxrs and Jakarta (unless that module was updated accordingly). |
|
@kdubb Not too late for 3.0. But also doable for 2.20 if you wanted to add a feature. |
|
Ok. I'll eek out some time to tackle the next few days! |
I think it does affect both, yes. |
|
Alas, we did miss 3.0.0... |
|
This could now be done for 3.1.0 tho -- but time running short, |
|
@kdubb WDYT? I am hoping to get this (and matching one for Jakarta-RS repo) done ASAP, to make it in 3.1.0-rc1 (to get some more testing -- plus 3.1.0 will be the new baseline, LTS) |
|
Matching PR for Jakarta-RS providers: FasterXML/jackson-jakarta-rs-providers#65 |
|
@cowtowncoder Thanks for getting to this. I have had it on my task list but have been absolutely swamped. I'm not 100% sure wether this is the complete fix. Our working solution was to derive new providers from Honestly the best solution would be to be specific about what can be consumed and produced. Basically, for example with yaml, make The real gotcha is that any provider that gets installed from this package, which all consume WILDCARD, will take over the output. So even if we derive new CBOR and YAML providers and tighten the Consumes/Produces, and XML is included (even though we don't use it)... we're bitten by this. That required us to create |
|
@kdubb Ok, I think the question here is whether this change is at least a step forward. |
|
Ah. I see.. the big(ger) problem is (and to some degree, because that'll "hi-jack" all content already so by the time method is called damage is already done, possibly (depending on how framework deals with multiple matches). But changing those annotations carries a big risk of breaking lots of users who rely on broad matching... Yeah, this is a mess. I am just wondering if this PR's defaults should be changed to make it opt-in. |
|
@cowtowncoder I really wish I had made time to get this into 3.0 because it's such a breaking change already. That being said, removing the "hi hack" (haha) probably isn't the broad breaking change due to the limited number of apis that actually use content negotiation; I would guess that 90+% of apps use this for "matching" not supporting it as a true "request for output content-type". |
|
FWTW there are couple of unfortunate but necessary behavioral changes in 3.1 over 3.0 -- to try to make 3.1 true 3.x baseline -- so it's ok. And 3.1.0-rc1 has been out for... 2 weeks? ... no reports, but then again RCs don't get much testing. We'll see. :) |
When
hasMatchingMediaTypereturnstrueby default, it is impossible to have a catch-all provider, or even a sensible and predicatable error, when the response doesn’t have a content-type.