Skip to content

Feature/tendering search filters restyle#255

Closed
Sh3rd3n wants to merge 37 commits into
Ficodes:mainfrom
DOME-Marketplace:feature/tendering-search-filters-restyle
Closed

Feature/tendering search filters restyle#255
Sh3rd3n wants to merge 37 commits into
Ficodes:mainfrom
DOME-Marketplace:feature/tendering-search-filters-restyle

Conversation

@Sh3rd3n
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Sh3rd3n Sh3rd3n commented May 25, 2026

SYSTEM_TESTING: ACTIVATE
TM_VERSION: 1.10.2

imitev-bae and others added 30 commits April 22, 2026 10:56
* Category and browsing changes

* correct routing for customer/provider pages

* bottom of homepage correct redirect

* fixing "what is dome marketplace" icons in homepage

---------

Co-authored-by: Ivan Mitev <>
* Category and browsing changes

* correct routing for customer/provider pages

* bottom of homepage correct redirect

* fixing "what is dome marketplace" icons in homepage

---------

Co-authored-by: Ivan Mitev <>
@fdelavega
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which branch did you use to add the new feature? I see the changes that belong to feature/new-search-page branch here, which I cannot merge since this is a WiP in other branch. Please create a new branch for main and create a PR just with you tender feature

@fdelavega fdelavega closed this May 25, 2026
@Sh3rd3n
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sh3rd3n commented May 26, 2026

Hi, I used feature/tendering-search-filters-restyle, but I see now that the branch was based on previous tender QA work that already included changes from feature/new-search-page.

That explains why unrelated new-search-page changes are showing up in this PR. I’ll recreate a clean branch from main and apply only the tender provider search/filter changes there, then open a new PR with a clean diff.

@Sh3rd3n Sh3rd3n deleted the feature/tendering-search-filters-restyle branch May 26, 2026 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants