Add user preference for showing adult titles.#1240
Add user preference for showing adult titles.#1240gregersn wants to merge 1 commit intoFuzzyGrim:devfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new user-configurable setting that empowers individuals to determine whether adult-rated content is displayed within their search results across various integrated media providers. This enhancement significantly improves user control over content filtering, providing a more personalized and tailored content discovery experience. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a user preference to show or hide adult-rated titles in search results. The implementation is well-structured, adding the preference to the User model, providing a UI toggle, and correctly plumbing the setting down through the service and provider layers. The logic to conditionally filter content is sound.
I've added one comment regarding the need to update the test suite to reflect the function signature changes, which is a crucial step to ensure the build passes and the application remains stable. Once that is addressed, this PR should be in good shape.
Note: Security Review did not run due to the size of the PR.
82d18c0 to
df9cc4e
Compare
No description provided.