Skip to content

Conversation

@hivanalejandro
Copy link
Contributor

@hivanalejandro hivanalejandro commented Mar 19, 2025

Description

Fixes b/393178651

Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.

Checklist

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: run Issues related to the Cloud Run API. asset: pattern DEE Asset tagging - Pattern. labels Mar 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @hivanalejandro, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request is a chore that migrates the region tag cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_imagemagick in the Dockerfile for the image-processing sample. The changes involve moving the [START cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tag and the [END cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tag to wrap the Imagemagick installation section in the Dockerfile.

Highlights

  • Region Tag Migration: The primary change involves migrating the region tag cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_imagemagick to properly encapsulate the relevant section of the Dockerfile.
  • Dockerfile Update: The Dockerfile is updated to include the [START cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] and [END cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tags.

Changelog

  • run/image-processing/Dockerfile
    • Moved [START cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tag to line 18.
    • Moved [END cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tag to line 30.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A tag's migration, a Docker's plight,
To keep the regions, aligned and right.
From Node's embrace, to ImageMagick's call,
Ensuring the sample stands tall for all.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request migrates a region tag in the Dockerfile. The changes look straightforward and necessary for maintaining the codebase. However, I have a suggestion to improve the placement of the region tags for better clarity.

Summary of Findings

  • Region tag placement: The placement of the [START cloudrun_imageproc_dockerfile_nodejs] tag could be improved for better code organization and readability. It should be placed before the FROM instruction to clearly indicate the start of the Node.js Dockerfile configuration.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is almost ready for merging. Addressing the placement of the region tag as suggested would improve the code's clarity. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@eapl-gemugami eapl-gemugami left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hivanalejandro hivanalejandro marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2025 19:58
@hivanalejandro hivanalejandro requested review from a team as code owners March 19, 2025 19:58
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 1 region tag.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@hivanalejandro hivanalejandro requested a review from iennae March 19, 2025 20:21
@glasnt glasnt merged commit b9417a9 into main Mar 20, 2025
12 checks passed
@glasnt glasnt deleted the hivanalejandro-migrate-region-step1-393178651 branch March 20, 2025 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: run Issues related to the Cloud Run API. asset: pattern DEE Asset tagging - Pattern. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants