Skip to content

Conversation

@googlyrahman
Copy link
Member

Automated: Migrate paths from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface. gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: gcs-cli-hyd@google.com

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

cc: @sushantkhanna

@googlyrahman googlyrahman requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2025 18:14
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @googlyrahman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is part of an ongoing initiative to standardize interactions with Google Cloud Storage by migrating from the legacy gsutil tool to the more performant and unified gcloud storage CLI. The changes, which were automatically generated, update existing Jupyter notebooks to use the new command syntax. Reviewers are encouraged to thoroughly test these modifications due to potential subtle behavioral differences between the two tools, especially concerning command output and file deletion logic.

Highlights

  • Automated Migration: This pull request automates the migration of gsutil commands to the modern gcloud storage command-line interface across several Jupyter notebooks.
  • Command Replacements: Key gsutil commands such as mb (make bucket), ls (list), iam ch (IAM policy change), cp (copy), cat (concatenate), and rm (remove) have been replaced with their gcloud storage equivalents.
  • Migration Notes Added: Specific comments have been added to the notebooks, particularly for iam ch commands, to highlight the increased complexity of migrating these operations and the need for careful review.
  • Impacted Notebooks: The changes affect various notebooks within the community/model_garden, official/automl, official/generative_ai, official/pipelines, and official/prediction directories, ensuring consistency with the recommended Google Cloud Storage CLI.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request contains automated migrations from gsutil to gcloud storage across several Jupyter notebooks. While most of the command conversions are correct, I've found a recurring critical issue in four of the notebooks. The logic to parse the bucket location after migration is broken due to a change in the output format of the gcloud storage command compared to the old gsutil command. This will cause an IndexError and break the execution of these notebooks. I've left specific comments with code suggestions to fix this issue in each affected file. Please review these suggestions carefully. The other migrations appear to be correct.

" shell_output = ! gsutil ls -Lb {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n",
" bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
# Note: The format of the full listing output is different. gcloud storage uses a title case for keys and will not display a field if its value is "None".
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The automated migration from gsutil to gcloud storage has introduced a bug here. The output format of gcloud storage ls --full --buckets is different from gsutil ls -Lb. Specifically, the location information is prefixed with Location: instead of Location constraint:. The current grep command will not find a match, causing shell_output to be empty and leading to an IndexError on the next line when trying to access shell_output[0]. This will break the notebook's execution. The grep and sed commands should be updated to parse the new output format.

Suggested change
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location:\" | sed 's/Location: *//'\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",

" assert BUCKET_URI.startswith(\"gs://\"), \"BUCKET_URI must start with `gs://`.\"\n",
" shell_output = ! gsutil ls -Lb {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n",
" bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The automated migration from gsutil to gcloud storage has introduced a bug here. The output format of gcloud storage ls --full --buckets is different from gsutil ls -Lb. Specifically, the location information is prefixed with Location: instead of Location constraint:. The current grep command will not find a match, causing shell_output to be empty and leading to an IndexError on the next line when trying to access shell_output[0]. This will break the notebook's execution. The grep and sed commands should be updated to parse the new output format.

Suggested change
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location:\" | sed 's/Location: *//'\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",

" assert BUCKET_URI.startswith(\"gs://\"), \"BUCKET_URI must start with `gs://`.\"\n",
" shell_output = ! gsutil ls -Lb {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n",
" bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The automated migration from gsutil to gcloud storage has introduced a bug here. The output format of gcloud storage ls --full --buckets is different from gsutil ls -Lb. Specifically, the location information is prefixed with Location: instead of Location constraint:. The current grep command will not find a match, causing shell_output to be empty and leading to an IndexError on the next line when trying to access shell_output[0]. This will break the notebook's execution. The grep and sed commands should be updated to parse the new output format.

Suggested change
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location:\" | sed 's/Location: *//'\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",

" shell_output = ! gsutil ls -Lb {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n",
" bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
# Note: The format of the full listing output is different. gcloud storage uses a title case for keys and will not display a field if its value is "None".
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The automated migration from gsutil to gcloud storage has introduced a bug here. The output format of gcloud storage ls --full --buckets is different from gsutil ls -Lb. Specifically, the location information is prefixed with Location: instead of Location constraint:. The current grep command will not find a match, causing shell_output to be empty and leading to an IndexError on the next line when trying to access shell_output[0]. This will break the notebook's execution. The grep and sed commands should be updated to parse the new output format.

Suggested change
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location constraint:\" | sed \"s/Location constraint://\"\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",
" shell_output = ! gcloud storage ls --full --buckets {BUCKET_NAME} | grep \"Location:\" | sed 's/Location: *//'\n", " bucket_region = shell_output[0].strip().lower()\n",

@gericdong gericdong merged commit ca7d4e1 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Dec 19, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants