Skip to content

Updating openapi-explorer to 2.4.799, add custom patch to fix nullability. (7.1) - #26120

Merged
dennisoelkers merged 1 commit into
7.1from
update/openapi-explorer-20260522-7.1
May 27, 2026
Merged

Updating openapi-explorer to 2.4.799, add custom patch to fix nullability. (7.1)#26120
dennisoelkers merged 1 commit into
7.1from
update/openapi-explorer-20260522-7.1

Conversation

@dennisoelkers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note: This is a backport of #26105 to 7.1.

Description

Motivation and Context

This PR is updating the openapi-explorer component used for the integrated API browser, to benefit from recent fixes related to schema parsing.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have requested a documentation update.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.

…lability. (#26105)

* Updating `openapi-explorer` to `2.4.799`.

* Adding changelog snippet.

* Adding custom patch for `openapi-explorer` until bugs are resolved upstream.

* Adding pathces.

(cherry picked from commit 4c37054)
@dennisoelkers
dennisoelkers requested a review from thll May 26, 2026 09:08

@thll thll left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests successful. Can't tell if the changes to yarn.lock are all correct for the 7.1 backport, though.

@dennisoelkers
dennisoelkers merged commit 0070f0b into 7.1 May 27, 2026
23 checks passed
@dennisoelkers
dennisoelkers deleted the update/openapi-explorer-20260522-7.1 branch May 27, 2026 06:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants