Skip to content

Labels

Labels

34 labels

  • advanced

    advanced
    Advanced-level, architecturally significant work

  • area: architecture

    area: architecture
    Interface design, type safety, structural decisions

  • area: ci-cd

    area: ci-cd
    Build pipeline and automation

  • area: core

    area: core
    Core oracle implementation (RiskOracle, SorobanOracle)

  • area: governance

    area: governance
    Process, ownership, cross-repo coordination

  • area: observability

    area: observability
    Logging, metrics, health checks

  • area: packaging

    area: packaging
    Distribution, publishing, bundling

  • area: performance

    area: performance
    Latency, throughput, resource usage

  • area: resilience

    area: resilience
    Caching, retries, circuit breaking, fallback

  • area: security

    area: security
    Input validation, supply chain, trust boundaries

  • area: testing

    area: testing
    Test infrastructure and coverage

  • bug

    bug
    Something isn't working

  • cross-repo-drift

    cross-repo-drift
    Shared contract drift detected by the weekly sync check

  • difficulty: L

    difficulty: L
    Large effort — spans multiple components or repos

  • difficulty: M

    difficulty: M
    Medium effort — single-component change, clear scope

  • difficulty: XL

    difficulty: XL
    Extra-large effort — major subsystem or open-ended design work

  • documentation

    documentation
    Improvements or additions to documentation

  • duplicate

    duplicate
    This issue or pull request already exists

  • enhancement

    enhancement
    New feature or request

  • good first issue

    good first issue
    Good for newcomers

  • GrantFox OSS

    GrantFox OSS
    Issue tracked in GrantFox OSS

  • help wanted

    help wanted
    Extra attention is needed

  • invalid

    invalid
    This doesn't seem right

  • Maybe Rewarded

    Maybe Rewarded
    Issue may be eligible for a GrantFox reward

  • Official Campaign | FWC26

    Official Campaign | FWC26
    Campaign: Official Campaign | FWC26

  • priority: P0-critical

    priority: P0-critical
    Blocking/foundational — other advanced issues depend on this landing first

  • priority: P1-high

    priority: P1-high
    High priority — core roadmap or security-relevant

  • priority: P2-medium

    priority: P2-medium
    Medium priority — valuable, not blocking

  • priority: P3-low

    priority: P3-low
    Low priority — nice to have, or gated on another issue's findings

  • question

    question
    Further information is requested