evil-helix 20250104 (new formula)

[jonasdiemer]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

Another attempt (#204608 didn't work).

[github-actions]

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

[daeho-ro]

The versioning way is different between the package source and release tag. Even if I read the version from the .toml file, it is 25.1.0 and version command returns 25.1, still not match.

[chenrui333]

aha, maybe worth an upstream issue report.

[jonasdiemer]

Any chance to get the 2nd required review?

[SMillerDev]

The problem isn't the amount of reviews, it's a failing build.

[jonasdiemer]

Thanks, @SMillerDev. I fixed the version test in the formula to match upstream.

I saw others were not happy how upstream is handling version information in source vs release tag. Tend to agree, but it shouldn't block this PR IMO.

[jonasdiemer]

So, I guess now it only takes an approval to merge? How can we proceed? Thanks!