-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
qt: Change QT_FEATURE
to FEATURE
#207131
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
qt: Change QT_FEATURE
to FEATURE
#207131
Conversation
f78f2cc
to
a73c374
Compare
Welp, can't figure out what's wrong with |
From the Formula Cookbook:
Please squash your commits. |
Oh right, always forget that point 🙁. Anyways there is a more important task of getting it to work since it seems changing this did detect an incompatibility. Even if it could be a false-positive, it would be good to report it if so. Anyone familiar with how this was configured for homebrew could pitch in and look at the error messages? The immediate error seems is with unnecessary dependency and is dropped in later versions 1. Footnotes |
The latter does additional checks for compatibility between features. Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <[email protected]>
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?The
QT_FEATURE
bypasses some of the checks that are made when initializing the features, e.g.FEATURE_static
andFEATURE_shared
are mutually exclusive.There was also a patch that seemed to be outdated based on the linked bug.