archivemount-ng 1a (new formula) #210084
Draft
archivemount-ng 1a (new formula) #210084
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cho-m
added
maintainer feedback
|
I would support using it as new upstream for the formula, to avoid duplication and confusion. This seems the most useful way forward for our users. |
|
As the maintainer of the macOS formula, I'm personally inclined to "deprecate and recommend replacement" rather than quietly replace the now-defunct formula. That said, I'll follow Homebrew's lead on this, to avoid confusion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not sure yet if this should be a new formula or be used as new upstream for
archivemount.Created by current Debian maintainer of
archivemountso Debian/Ubuntu provides it https://packages.debian.org/source/trixie/archivemountAccording to Repology https://repology.org/project/fusefs%3Aarchivemount/versions, MacPorts and NixOS accepted it too. So may meet our distribution policy for replacing name.
Though cannot meet "official successor" status due to death of original author: cybernoid/archivemount#29
If new formula, will most likely deprecate
archivemountperhaps with replacement recommendation.So question of whether we want to automatically upgrade all users or just alert users of a replacement option.