openjdk 24

[calvinit]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

Java 24 / JDK 24: General Availability.

• https://jdk.java.net/24/
• https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2025-March/009843.html
• https://github.com/openjdk/jdk24u/releases/tag/jdk-24-ga

[calvinit]

Here are some logs from the "Post-build steps" CI job on macOS.
It is unclear whether we need to pay special attention to and address them:

==> Summary
/usr/local/Cellar/gnu-tar/1.35: 17 files, 1.8MB
==> Running `brew cleanup gnu-tar`...
==> Determining openjdk bottle rebuild...
==> Bottling openjdk--24.sonoma.bottle.tar.gz...
Error: Failed applying an ad-hoc signature to /usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib:
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib: replacing existing signature
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed


/usr/local/opt/gnu-tar/bin/gtar --create --numeric-owner --mtime=2025-02-06 00:16:21 --sort=name --owner=0 --group=0 --numeric-owner --format=pax --pax-option=globexthdr.name=/GlobalHead.%n,exthdr.name=%d/PaxHeaders/%f,delete=atime,delete=ctime --file /Users/brew/actions-runner/_work/homebrew-core/homebrew-core/bottles/openjdk--24.sonoma.bottle.tar openjdk/24
==> Detecting if openjdk--24.sonoma.bottle.tar.gz is relocatable...
Error: Failed applying an ad-hoc signature to /usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib:
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib: replacing existing signature
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk/24/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/MacOS/libjli.dylib: resource fork, Finder information, or similar detritus not allowed

[fxcoudert]

Gradle failure on Linux. Upstream issue: gradle/gradle#32290

[calvinit]

Gradle failure on Linux. Upstream issue: gradle/gradle#32290

Yes, I found that many failures are caused by the lack of support for the latest OpenJDK 24. This raises the question: should we rely on many non-LTS OpenJDK versions as their JVM environment (depends_on "openjdk")? After all, STS (Short-Term Support) only provides six months of support.