Skip to content

fix: LSDV-5228: Fix timeout on import sync jobs #4313

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

niklub
Copy link
Collaborator

@niklub niklub commented Jun 5, 2023

PR fulfills these requirements

  • Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
  • Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

  • Product design
  • Backend (Database)
  • Backend (API)
  • Frontend

Describe the reason for change

(link to issue, supportive screenshots etc.)

What does this fix?

(if this is a bug fix)

What is the new behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What is the current behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What libraries were added/updated?

(list all with version changes)

Does this change affect performance?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

Does this change affect security?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

What alternative approaches were there?

(briefly list any if applicable)

What feature flags were used to cover this change?

(briefly list any if applicable)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

(check only one)

  • Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
  • Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
  • No
  • Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)

What level of testing was included in the change?

(check all that apply)

  • e2e
  • integration
  • unit

Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?

(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 27752eb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/647da4627109a90008238fa5

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jun 5, 2023
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 27752eb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/647da46218c11e00089bc581

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.66%. Comparing base (dab4281) to head (27752eb).
Report is 2073 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4313      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    75.67%   75.66%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          156      156              
  Lines        12158    12158              
===========================================
- Hits          9200     9199       -1     
- Misses        2958     2959       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Dr-Desty-Nova
Copy link

Why is this not merged yet?

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants