[0.19] Fix how "all matches" extractor are handled#2573
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Andrea Lamparelli <a.lamparelli95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Lamparelli <a.lamparelli95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Lamparelli <a.lamparelli95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Lamparelli <a.lamparelli95@gmail.com>
lampajr
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport: #2568
Fixes Issue
The expectation is that "previewing" a label execution and its actual label value computation return the same result, which is not true a the moment when one of the extractor is marked as "all matches".
Changes proposed
flatten((ArrayNode) row[3])Check List (Check all the applicable boxes)