Editorial review of part 1 #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
review for IBM style, grammar, terminology, and for consistency. Signed-off-by: Allen Dean <[email protected]> Addresses:
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
review Part 1 for IBM style, grammar, terminology, and for consistency.
1.instead of sequential for easier revision later. Sorry that this creates a bigger diff than there really is to the content.shhighlighting and moved most commands to their own line for easy scanning.<to<and changed variable toyour_initialswhere I noticed. Also put that string into<pre>with backticks.I checked the output locally, but make sure everything looks good as published.
Signed-off-by: Allen Dean [email protected]