Thermoelectric Generators using Skutterudites and Selenium Alloys with Endotaxial Nanostructures for Solar-Thermal Energy Applications
This study investigates the potential of skutterudites and selenium alloys with endotaxial nanostructures in enhancing the efficiency of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) for solar-thermal energy applications. Recognizing the limitations of traditional TEG materials at high temperatures, this paper focuses on the advancement of skutterudites and bismuth telluride selenide
Keywords: thermoelectric generators, skutterudites, selenium alloys, endotaxial nanostructures, solar-thermal energy, bismuth telluride selenide, lead telluride selenide, high-temperature applications.
The world's growing energy demand poses significant challenges in developing sustainable and renewable energy solutions. Traditional fossil fuels are limited and contribute to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. Solar energy is an abundant renewable resource but requires efficient technologies to convert it into usable energy forms. Traditional solar-thermal systems rely on mechanical engines and turbines, but there is one promising technology is thermoelectric generation, which uses the Seebeck effect to directly convert a temperature gradient into electrical power. Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) have advantages of being solid-state devices with no moving parts, silent operation, and long lifetimes. However, widespread adoption of TEGs has been limited by their historically low conversion efficiencies compared to other renewable technologies.
Recent advances in materials science and nanotechnology have enabled the development of nanostructured thermoelectric materials with significantly improved efficiency. In particular, advances in skutterudites and alloys based on bismuth tellurium selenide
Recent research has focused on using nanostructured alloys to reduce thermal conductivity, thereby boosting the thermoelectric figure of merit (
TEGs work via the Seebeck effect, in which a voltage is generated when a temperature gradient is applied across a semiconducting material. The voltage arises from charge carriers diffusing from the hot to cold side, creating a potential difference. TEGs contain p- and n-type semiconducting "legs" electrically in series and thermally in parallel between two ceramic plates. When a temperature gradient is applied, charge carriers flow and the TEG acts as a power source.[2] TEGs offer solid-state electricity generation with no moving parts, low maintenance, and silent operation. However, their efficiency has historically been low compared to mechanical generators.[15]
A material's thermoelectric efficiency is measured by the figure of merit,
where
Early TEGs used bismuth telluride alloys, which are limited to low temperatures
Commercial TEGs predominantly employ alloys based on
The challenges extend beyond material properties to encompass design considerations. The geometry of thermoelectric modules, the contact resistance between the thermoelectric material and the electrodes, and the overall system design all play pivotal roles in the efficiency of TEGs. Inefficiencies at any stage can lead to considerable power loss, underscoring the need for holistic optimization. Issues of cost and material availability also loom large. Many high-performance thermoelectric materials are composed of rare or toxic elements, presenting significant barriers to widespread adoption.[28] The cost of materials, coupled with the intricacies of manufacturing thermoelectric modules, contributes to the overall expense, positioning TEGs at a competitive disadvantage compared to other renewable energy technologies.
However, the best thermoelectric materials are “phonon-glass electron-crystals” that conduct electricity like a crystalline material but transmit heat like an amorphous glass.[21] Recent research has turned towards nanostructured TE materials as a strategy to increase
The advent of nanotechnology has ushered in a renaissance in the field of thermoelectric generators (TEGs), heralding new solutions to the longstanding limitations of traditional materials.[16] At the nanoscale, the physical properties of materials can diverge significantly from their bulk counterparts, often leading to superior thermoelectric performance.[18],[19] This is particularly true for nanostructured materials, which can exhibit enhanced electrical properties while simultaneously reducing thermal conductivity, thereby elevating the figure of merit,
Nanostructuring is an effective strategy to reduce thermal conductivity by enhancing phonon scattering (the heat-carrying vibrations in a crystal lattice) at internal interfaces while maintaining good electrical properties.[2] This suppresses κL, the lattice thermal conductivity, without greatly affecting electrical conductivity. The main concept behind it, phonon-glass electron-crystal (PGEC) exploits the disparity between the mean free paths of phonons and charge carriers to decouple thermal and electrical transport.[17] By structuring TE materials on the
The theoretical advantages of nanostructured materials are compelling. Quantum confinement effects, which emerge when the dimensions of a material approach the de Broglie wavelength of the charge carriers, can lead to the formation of discrete energy levels.[22] This quantum confinement can increase the density of states near the Fermi level, potentially enhancing the Seebeck coefficient.[23] Additionally, nanostructured interfaces can serve as effective filters for phonons, further reducing thermal conductivity while allowing electrons to pass relatively unhindered. Besides enabling ECPG behavior, nanostructures also provide thermal and chemical stability at high temperatures, resistance against heat-induced sublimation, and flexibility for polymer integration. These practical advantages further bolster the viability of nanocomposites for stable, efficient TEG operation at high temperatures. Additionally, nanomanufacturing techniques allow economical, large-scale production using methods like electrodeposition and spray deposition, addressing conventional cost barriers. There are several ways to impede phonon transport which includes but is not limited to:
- Nanocomposites - introducing nanoscale inclusions of a secondary phase into a thermoelectric matrix. The inclusions scatter phonons to reduce thermal conductivity while minimally impacting charge transport.
- Quantum dot superlattices - alternating nanoscale layers of different materials. This introduces interfaces that scatter phonons while allowing carrier transmission through band alignment.
- Low-dimensional structures - nanostructures like nanowires and thin films scatter phonons across their boundaries to reduce thermal conductivity.
- Grain boundary engineering - reducing grain size to nanoscale dimensions increases phonon scattering at grain boundaries, lowering thermal conductivity.
- Endotaxial nanostructures - epitaxial, crystallographically aligned nanostructures that reduce thermal conductivity while preserving electrical properties.
- Nanoporous materials - Introducing nanopores into a material creates boundaries that scatter phonons, reducing lattice thermal conductivity. The pore size and volume fraction can be tuned to scatter phonons most effectively.
- Nanoparticle etching - Preferential chemical etching of nanoparticles from a host matrix leaves behind nanoscale holes and cavities. These nanoporous regions scatter phonons similar to intentionally introduced nanopores.
- Nanotwinning - Introducing high densities of nanoscale twins and stacking faults into a crystal lattice scatters phonons effectively. This preserves carrier properties as the twins are crystallographically aligned with the matrix.
- Nanoinclusions - incorporating secondary phase inclusions with dimensions below
$\sim100,\text{nm}$ leads to extensive phonon scattering at nanoinclusion interfaces, suppressing thermal conductivity.
Out of these approaches, endotaxial nanostructures are a promising approach where nanocrystals are embedded in a bulk matrix with aligned crystal lattices. This maintains high electrical conductivity as charge carriers move unimpeded, but increases phonon scattering at nanocrystal interfaces. With advanced nanostructuring techniques,
Beyond the intrinsic material properties, nanotechnology also offers practical advantages in the fabrication of TEGs. Advanced techniques such as molecular beam epitaxy, chemical vapor deposition, and electrodeposition enable the production of thermoelectric materials with precise control over composition and doping levels.[25] This fine-tuning is critical for optimizing the performance of TEGs, particularly in applications that operate across varying temperature gradients. However, the practical realization of nanotechnology's potential in TEGs is not without challenges. The synthesis of nanostructured materials often requires sophisticated equipment and processes, which can be cost-prohibitive. Moreover, maintaining the stability of nanostructures at extremely high temperatures—a requirement for many TEG applications—poses additional hurdles.[26] Research into the stabilization of nanostructures through the use of robust matrix materials and encapsulation techniques is ongoing.
The performance of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) is inherently tied to their operating temperature. High-temperature operation, while enabling access to a vast thermal energy spectrum, introduces a suite of challenges that can significantly impede efficiency.[15] The crux of the difficulty lies in the dual need to maintain a high Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity while minimizing thermal conductivity — a triad of requirements that becomes increasingly difficult to satisfy as temperatures rise.[16]
At elevated temperatures, materials typically face exacerbated rates of thermal diffusion, leading to a rise in thermal conductivity which can dilute the temperature gradient, the driving force behind the Seebeck effect.[17] This escalation in thermal conductivity is often accompanied by a decline in material reliability due to phenomena like thermal expansion, sublimation, crystallite growth, phase transitions, and chemical decomposition. Such factors not only reduce the immediate efficiency of TEGs but also their long-term stability and durability, impacting overall device lifespan.[18] Moreover, maintaining a high efficiency at elevated temperatures requires the sustained integrity of the material's microstructure. The interplay between thermal stress and material robustness becomes critical, as the microstructure defines the transport properties of charge carriers and phonons.[20] Any degradation at this level can cause a marked decline in
Besides material stability, the significance of a constant temperature differential cannot be overstated. Maintaining a large temperature differential
where
In essence, high-temperature operation amplifies the fundamental challenges associated with thermoelectric materials and device design. The push for higher operational temperatures necessitates materials that can withstand not only the immediate effects of heat but also the long-term implications on material structure and performance.[19] Successfully managing these complexities is key to unlocking the potential of TEGs in high-temperature applications, such as those encountered in solar-thermal energy conversion, where the payoff in terms of efficiency gains could be substantial.[28]
Skutterudites are a class of compounds with the general formula
Nanostructuring skutterudites further reduces thermal conductivity and increases
Doping skutterudites with rare earth elements also improves
N-type bismuth tellurium selenide
The alloying of
Nanostructuring these alloys introduces a new dimension to their thermoelectric capabilities. By incorporating features on the nanometer scale, the phonon scattering can be significantly increased without adversely affecting the movement of electrons. It is achieved because phonons, with their relatively long mean free paths, are more susceptible to boundary scattering at the nanoscale than electrons. This results in a lowered lattice thermal conductivity while maintaining or even enhancing the electrical conductivity thereby boosting the
Endotaxial nanostructuring takes this concept further by embedding nanoscale features within the crystal lattice of the host material in a coherent manner. This endotaxial integration allows for the creation of a composite material where the interfaces between the nano-inclusions and the amorphous matrix are defect-free, minimizing electron scattering while still disrupting phonon transport. The result is an unprecedented reduction in lattice thermal conductivity and an improvement in the electrical transport properties, leading to a higher
Besides the high power factor enabled, oriented nanostructuring also helps postpone the onset of performance deterioration to temperatures above
Having elucidated the favorable high-temperature TE attributes, bulk synthesis and practical integration of these nanomaterials are also pivotal considerations for real-world viability. The synthesis of n-type bismuth tellurium selenide
The key to high performance lies in achieving the appropriate nano-inclusions dimensions of around
P-type lead tellurium selenide
Significantly, nanostructured
When used in conjunction with n-type thermoelectric materials, such as
Significantly, colloidal
However, the fabrication of p-type
In terms of device fabrication, recent advances in additive manufacturing and nanofabrication offer promising routes to construct TEGs with intricate geometries and optimized material utilization. These techniques can potentially lower production costs and enable the design of TEGs that are better suited to specific applications.
The Thermal Floater represents a novel integration of thermoelectric technology with renewable solar energy, capturing the essence of efficiency and innovation in its design. Central to its operation is a floating platform that houses a Peltier device, which is the heart of the thermoelectric generator (TEG), flanked by a solar-thermal concentrator and an aquatic-based cooling system. The solar-thermal concentrator is a large fresnel lens array that sunlight onto a heat receiver, which in turn transfers the concentrated thermal energy to the hot side of the Peltier device. This concentrator is meticulously designed to track the sun's trajectory, ensuring that the maximum amount of solar radiation is captured throughout the day. The Peltier device, composed of an array of n-type and p-type semiconductor materials, exploits the temperature gradient established between its hot and cold sides to generate electricity through the Seebeck effect.
The operational mechanism of the Peltier device hinges on maintaining a substantial temperature differential. The solar-thermal concentrator provides the requisite heat on the hot side, while the cold side is ingeniously cooled by the surrounding water. The design of the Thermal Floater allows it to rest on a body of water, exploiting its natural heat sink properties. The lower side of the device makes contact with water, leveraging its capacity to absorb and dissipate heat due to its high specific heat capacity and the convective flows present in an aquatic environment. The cooling mechanism is further augmented by a heat exchanger system that circulates water through the device. Water is drawn from the cooler depths and is circulated through the heat exchanger, efficiently removing the waste heat from the cold side of the Peltier device before being released back into the environment. This consistent removal of heat ensures that the temperature differential across the Peltier device is maintained, thereby optimizing the electricity generation process. Additionally, the floating design of the Thermal Floater inherently provides a self-stabilizing cooling system. As the water at the interface heats up, it naturally rises due to forced convection, and cooler water from below replaces it, thus maintaining a constant cooling effect. This passive cooling mechanism is both energy-efficient and self-regulating, reducing the need for additional power to maintain the temperature gradient.
In enhancing the Thermal Floater design, a key consideration lies in its ability to withstand varying wave conditions. It's designed to survive up to Beaufort scale level 7 waves, which corresponds to wave heights of up to 4 meters. This capability is crucial as the Thermal Floater operates in aquatic environments where wave dynamics can significantly impact performance and longevity. The resilience to such wave conditions is achieved through a combination of robust structural design and advanced materials. The platform is constructed with materials that provide sufficient buoyancy and structural integrity, ensuring stability and durability even in rough sea conditions. This stability is not only essential for maintaining the position and orientation of the solar-thermal concentrator for optimal sun exposure but also crucial for the safety and longevity of the thermoelectric components and the overall system. Moreover, the integration of the thermoelectric generator (TEG) within this design is optimized to ensure that the temperature differential necessary for efficient energy conversion is maintained despite the dynamic thermal environment. The inherent thermal properties of the water body, coupled with the cooling mechanisms, provide a consistent and effective heat sink for the TEG. This aspect is vital in sustaining the temperature gradient across the TEG, thereby enabling a consistent and efficient energy conversion process. The design's adaptability to different aquatic environments, ranging from calm lakes to rougher coastal regions, further broadens its applicability and increases its potential as a versatile and resilient renewable energy source.
The Thermal Floater's robust design, capable of withstanding significant wave forces, combined with its efficient and stable thermoelectric energy conversion, positions it as a promising solution for harnessing solar energy in a variety of aquatic environments. This adaptability enhances its potential for widespread deployment, offering a reliable and sustainable alternative to traditional energy sources.
The incorporation of high-performance thermoelectric alloys into the Thermal Floater's design is anticipated to significantly augment its energy conversion efficiency. The crux of this enhancement lies in the superior properties of n-type bismuth tellurium selenide and p-type lead tellurium selenide alloys, particularly when engineered with endotaxial nanostructures. By implementing these advanced alloys, the Thermal Floater is expected to exhibit a marked increase in its operational efficiency. The n-type bismuth tellurium selenide alloys, with their inherent high electron mobility and low lattice thermal conductivity, contribute to a significant reduction in energy loss due to heat dissipation. When these materials are exposed to the high temperatures generated by the solar concentrator, they are predicted to maintain their thermoelectric performance better than traditional thermoelectric materials, which often degrade under similar conditions. The p-type lead tellurium selenide alloys complement this by providing a robust counterpart that maintains high hole mobility at elevated temperatures. What makes nanostructured
The benefits of nanostructuring, and particularly endotaxial nanostructuring, in these materials cannot be overstated. The endotaxial nanostructures provide a stable thermoelectric matrix that can withstand the rigorous temperature fluctuations experienced in solar-thermal applications. This stability is crucial for the longevity and reliability of the Thermal Floater, as it reduces the risk of material failure due to thermal cycling. The potential increase in efficiency and energy output with these materials is also a function of their ability to operate effectively over a wide range of temperatures. The Thermal Floater, by design, is exposed to varying degrees of solar intensity throughout the day. The high-performance alloys enable the device to convert a larger proportion of the incident solar energy into electricity, even as the temperature of the hot side changes.
In terms of energy output, the integration of these alloys into the Thermal Floater is projected to elevate the power generation capacity of the device. With higher
even incremental gains of
Considering a baseline
The advantages of these high-performance alloys extend beyond their immediate impact on efficiency and energy output. They also have the potential to reduce the overall footprint of the Thermal Floater, as more power can be generated from a smaller array of concentrators, minimizing the space and materials required for deployment. Additionally, the enhanced stability of these materials can lead to lower maintenance costs and longer service intervals, further improving the economic and operational viability of the technology. With further ongoing advances in large-area thin film fabrication and flexible substrates, such all-nanostructure p-n TEGs carry exceptional potential for ubiquitous deployment in solar concentrator-linked electricity production.
The integration of high-performance thermoelectric alloys into the Thermal Floater represents a significant technological advancement with the potential to revolutionize solar-thermal applications. However, this integration is not without its challenges. These challenges, ranging from material stability and cost implications to system integration and environmental considerations, need to be addressed to ensure the successful implementation and widespread adoption of this innovative technology.
One of the primary challenges is ensuring the stability of thermoelectric materials under high operating temperatures and fluctuating thermal conditions. These conditions inherent to solar-thermal applications pose significant challenges to the stability of thermoelectric materials. Over time, they can lead to material degradation, such as phase changes, grain growth, and inter-diffusion of elements, which adversely affect the thermoelectric properties. To combat this, recent advancements in materials science have led to the development of more stable thermoelectric compounds. The use of nanostructuring, particularly endotaxial nanostructures, has been shown to enhance the thermal stability of these materials. Additionally, research into new alloy compositions and protective coatings can provide further resistance to high-temperature-induced degradation. Coating or doping with elements that have a high melting point can reduce sublimation and phase segregation. Additionally, encapsulation techniques that shield the thermoelectric elements from direct exposure to harsh environmental conditions have shown promise in extending the lifespan of the materials.
Another significant hurdle is the cost of production of high-performance thermoelectric materials, especially those involving advanced nanostructuring techniques. The complexity of manufacturing processes, coupled with the expense of raw materials, can make the end product economically challenging for large-scale applications. The solution to this lies in achieving economies of scale and optimizing manufacturing processes. As the demand for thermoelectric materials grows, larger-scale production can lead to a reduction in per-unit costs. Furthermore, ongoing research is focused on finding cost-effective alternatives and improving manufacturing techniques to make the process more economical without compromising the material's performance. Cost reduction is an area of intense research, with efforts being made to find more economical synthesis methods and alternative materials that are abundant and less expensive. Bulk manufacturing techniques, such as hot pressing and sintering, can lower production costs if adapted to nanostructured materials. Economies of scale may also be achievable as demand for high-efficiency thermoelectric materials increases and production processes become more streamlined.
Integrating these advanced thermoelectric materials into the Thermal Floater's design requires careful consideration of thermal and electrical contact, as well as mechanical stability. The materials must be compatible with other components of the device, such as heat exchangers and electrical interfaces, to ensure efficient and uninterrupted operation. Addressing these integration challenges necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration and the development of comprehensive design strategies. This includes the development of effective thermal interfaces and electrical contacts that minimize losses and maintain the integrity of the thermoelectric modules under operational conditions. Integration challenges can be mitigated by designing modular thermoelectric elements that can be easily incorporated into the Thermal Floater. Advances in materials engineering have led to the development of thermoelectric modules that can be tailored to specific thermal environments, allowing for more seamless integration. Improved interface materials, such as metallic interlayers, can also enhance the thermal and electrical contacts between the thermoelectric elements and the rest of the system.
Lastly, the environmental impact of producing thermoelectric materials cannot be overlooked. While the Thermal Floater is an environmentally friendly technology, its production process may have certain environmental impacts. To mitigate these impacts, it is essential to embrace green manufacturing practices and recycling strategies. Efforts should focus on minimizing waste and using environmentally benign materials and processes. Additionally, establishing recycling protocols for thermoelectric materials at the end of their lifecycle is crucial for maintaining a sustainable environmental footprint.
The deployment of the Thermal Floater, with its advanced thermoelectric materials, stands to offer significant environmental benefits. Improved efficiency in solar-thermal energy generation means more electricity can be produced from the same amount of solar energy, leading to a reduction in fossil fuel dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, by converting heat that would otherwise be lost to the environment into usable energy, the Thermal Floater enhances the overall energy economy.
From an economic standpoint, the cost of high-performance thermoelectric materials is balanced by the increased lifespan and energy output of the device. Although initial material costs are high, the extended operational life of the device, due to the durability of nanostructured materials, means fewer replacements and repairs. Additionally, higher efficiency translates to more power generation per unit area, reducing the space and infrastructure needed for solar farms, which can result in lower land costs and associated environmental disturbances. The economic implications extend to the potential for decentralized power generation. The Thermal Floater can be implemented in remote locations, reducing the need for extensive power grid infrastructures and minimizing transmission losses. This decentralization can lead to energy equity, providing power in areas previously without reliable electricity, and can spur economic development by enabling local energy production.
Looking to the future, it is expected that thermoelectric materials and device designs will continue to improve. Research is likely to yield materials with even higher
Further research areas include the development of more robust and environmentally friendly materials that maintain high performance without the use of rare or toxic elements. The exploration of three-dimensional thermoelectric materials, where charge carriers can move in a controlled manner through all three spatial dimensions, could also open new avenues for enhancing efficiency. The design of the Thermal Floater itself may evolve, with advancements in materials leading to lighter and more durable structures that can withstand harsh environmental conditions. This could make the technology suitable for a wider range of climates and locales, from deserts to maritime environments. Additionally, the integration of advanced control systems could enable the Thermal Floater to operate autonomously, further reducing the need for human intervention.
In conclusion, this paper has examined the potential of using advanced thermoelectric materials such as skutterudites and bismuth tellurium selenide and lead tellurium selenide alloys with precisely engineered endotaxial nanostructures to enhance the efficiency of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) for solar-thermal energy applications. These materials demonstrate high thermoelectric figures of merit (
Together with abundant, economical constituent elements, the advanced alloys carry tremendous potential for scalable and ubiquitous solar-driven power generation. However, challenges remain in scaling up nanostructured TE synthesis methods for economical production and ensuring compatibility with device fabrication processes. Further interdisciplinary research spanning materials science, physics, thermal engineering and manufacturing is pivotal to addressing these integration hurdles before widespread commercial adoption. Nonetheless, the exceptional conversion efficiencies recently demonstrated by these endotaxially nanostructured alloys underscore their potential to make the Thermal Floater a viable renewable electricity generation system, with positive environmental and economic impacts. Harnessing advances in thermoelectrics can make concentrated solar-thermal electricity competitive for utilities and off-grid applications worldwide.
-
Rowe, D.M. (Ed.). (2006). Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420038903
-
Snyder, G., & Toberer, E. (2008). Complex thermoelectric materials. Nature materials, 7, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2090
-
Nolas, G. S., Sharp, J., & Goldsmid, H. J. (2001). Thermoelectrics: Basic principles and new materials developments. Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04569-5
-
Shi, X., Yang, J., Salvador, J. R., Chi, M., Cho, J. Y., Wang, H., Bai, S., Yang, J., Zhang, W., & Chen, L. (2011). Multiple-filled skutterudites: High thermoelectric figure of merit through separately optimizing electrical and thermal transports. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133(20), 7837–7846. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja111199y
-
Liu, Z. Y., Zhu, J. L., Tong, X., et al. (2020). A review of CoSb3-based skutterudite thermoelectric materials. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 9, 647-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0407-4
-
Biswas, K., He, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., Uher, C., Dravid, V. P., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2011). Strained endotaxial nanostructures with high thermoelectric figure of merit. Nature chemistry, 3(2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.955
-
Yan, X., Poudel, B., Ma, Y., Liu, W. S., Joshi, G., Wang, H., Lan, Y., Wang, D., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. F. (2010). Experimental studies on anisotropic thermoelectric properties and structures of n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3. Nano letters, 10(9), 3373-3378. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101156v
-
Liu, H., Shi, X., Xu, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Chen, L., Li, Q., Uher, C., Day, T., & Snyder Jeffrey, G. (2012). Copper ion liquid-like thermoelectrics. Nature materials, 11(5), 422-425. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3273
-
Heremans, J. P., Jovovic, V., Toberer, E. S., Saramat, A., Kurosaki, K., Charoenphakdee, A., Yamanaka, S., & Snyder, G. J. (2008). Enhancement of thermoelectric efficiency in PbTe by distortion of the electronic density of states. Science, 321(5888), 554-557. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159725
-
Zhao, L. L., Wang, X. L., Wang, J. Y., Cheng, Z. X., Dou, S. X., Wang, J., & Liu, L. Q. (2015). Superior intrinsic thermoelectric performance with zT of 1.8 in single-crystal and melt-quenched highly dense Cu(2-x)Se bulks. Scientific Reports, 5, 7671. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07671
-
Zhang, Q., Chere, E. K., McEnaney, K., Yao, M., Cao, F., Ni, Y., Chen, S., Opeil, C., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (n.d.). Enhancement of thermoelectric performance of n-type PbSe by Cr doping with optimized carrier concentration. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201401977
-
Ho, C. K., & Iverson, B. D. (2014). Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 835-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.099
-
Montecucco, A., & Knox, A. R. (2014). Accurate simulation of thermoelectric power generating systems. Applied Energy, 118, 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.028
-
Lan, Y., Poudel, B., Ma, Y., Wang, D., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2009). Structure study of bulk nanograined thermoelectric bismuth antimony telluride. Nano Letters, 9(4), 1419-1422. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803235n
-
Bell, L. E. (2008). Cooling, heating, generating power, and recovering waste heat with thermoelectric systems. Science, 321(5895), 1457-1461. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158899
-
Goldsmid, H. J. (2010). Introduction to thermoelectricity. Springer Series in Materials Science. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00716-3
-
Tritt, T. M. (2006). Thermoelectric materials, phenomena, and applications: A bird's eye view. MRS Bulletin, 31, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2006.44
-
Sootsman, J. R., Chung, D. Y., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2009). New and old concepts in thermoelectric materials. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 48(46), 8616-8639. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200900598
-
Zebarjadi, M., Esfarjani, K., Dresselhaus, M. S., Ren, Z., & Chen, G. (2012). Perspectives on thermoelectrics: from fundamentals to device applications. Energy and Environmental Science, 5, 5147-5162. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15744193
-
Poudel, B., Hao, Q., Ma, Y., Lan, Y., Minnich, A., Yu, B., Yan, X., Wang, D., Muto, A., Vashaee, D., Chen, X., Liu, J., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2008). High-thermoelectric performance of nanostructured bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science, 320(5876), 634-638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156446
-
Vineis, C. J., Shakouri, A., Majumdar, A., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2010). Nanostructured thermoelectrics: big efficiency gains from small features. Advanced Materials, 22(36), 3970-3980. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201000839
-
Yang, CH., Chung, YF., Su, YS. et al. Band structure of molybdenum disulfide: from first principle to analytical band model. J Comput Electron 21, 571–581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-022-01880-2
-
Neophytou, N., & Kosina, H. (2011). Effects of confinement and orientation on the thermoelectric power factor of silicon nanowires. Physical Review B, 83. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245305
-
Madsen, G. K. H., & Singh, D. J. (n.d.). BoltzTraP. A code for calculating band-structure dependent quantities. arXiv:cond-mat/0602203. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0602203
-
Yu, B., Zebarjadi, M., Wang, H., Lukas, K., Wang, H., Wang, D., Opeil, C., Dresselhaus, M., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2012). Enhancement of thermoelectric properties by modulation-doping in silicon germanium alloy nanocomposites. Nano Letters, 12(4), 2077-2082. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3003045
-
Zide, J. M. O., Vashaee, D., Bian, Z. X., Zeng, G., Bowers, J. E., Shakouri, A., & Gossard, A. C. (2006). Demonstration of electron filtering to increase the Seebeck coefficient in
$\text{In}_{0.53}\text{Ga}_{0.47}\text{As/In}_{0.53}\text{Ga}_{0.28}\text{Al}_{0.19}\text{As}$ superlattices. Physical Review B, 74(20), 205335. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.205335 -
Yazawa, K., & Shakouri, A. (2011). Cost-efficiency trade-off and the design of thermoelectric power generators. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17), 7548-7553. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2005418
-
Heremans, J.P. (2014). Thermoelectricity: The ugly duckling. Nature, 508(7496), 327-328. doi: 10.1038/508327a
-
Yadav, A., Pipe, K.P., & Shtein, M. (2008). Fiber-Based Flexible Thermoelectric Power Generator. Journal of Power Sources, 175, 909-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.096
-
Díez, G., Pacios, M., Morata, A., & Tarancón, A. (2018). Silicon-based nanostructures for integrated thermoelectric generators. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 51. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aad683
-
Biswas, K., He, J., Blum, I. D., Wu, C. I., Hogan, T. P., Seidman, D. N., Dravid, V. P., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2012). High-performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures. Nature, 489(7416), 414-418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11439
-
Caillat, T. (1996). Properties of single crystalline semiconducting CoSb3. Journal of Applied Physics, 80(8), 4442-4449. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.363405
-
Scherrer, H., & Scherrer, S. (2006). Thermoelectric properties of bismuth antimony telluride solid solutions. Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano.
-
Heremans, J. P., Wiendlocha, B., & Chamoire, A. M. (2012). Resonant levels in bulk thermoelectric semiconductors. Energy Environ. Sci., 5(2), 5510-5530. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02612G
-
Pei, Y., Shi, X., LaLonde, A., Wang, H., Chen, L., & Snyder, G. J. (2011). Convergence of electronic bands for high performance bulk thermoelectrics. Nature, 473(7345), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09996
-
Zhu, T., Liu, Y., Fu, C., Heremans, J. P., Snyder, J. G., & Zhao, X. (2017). Compromise and synergy in high-efficiency thermoelectric materials. Advanced materials, 29(14), 1605884. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605884
-
Tan, G., Zhao, L. D., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2016). Rationally designing high-performance bulk thermoelectric materials. Chemical reviews, 116(19), 12123-12149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00255
-
Xie, W., Tang, X., Yan, Y., Zhang, Q., & Tritt, T. M. (2009). Unique nanostructures and enhanced thermoelectric performance of melt-spun BiSbTe alloys. Applied Physics Letters, 94(10), 102111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3097026
-
Fu, C., Bai, S., Liu, Y., Tang, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, X., & Zhu, T. (2015). Realizing high figure of merit in heavy-band p-type half-Heusler thermoelectric materials. Nature Communications, 6, 8144. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9144
-
Liu, W., Tan, X., Yin, K., Liu, H., Tang, X., Shi, J., Zhang, Q., & Uher, C. (2012). Convergence of Conduction Bands as a Means of Enhancing Thermoelectric Performance of
$n$ -Type${\mathrm{Mg}}_{2}{\mathrm{Si}}_{1\mathrm{-}x}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{x}$ Solid Solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108(16), 166601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.166601 -
Wu, M., Cui, H. H., Cai, S. T., Hao, S. Q., Liu, Y. K., Bailey, T. P., Zhang, Y. Y., Chen, Z. X., Luo, Y. B., Uher, C., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V. P., Yu, Y., Luo, Z. Z., Zou, Z. G., Yan, Q. Y., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2022). Weak Electron-Phonon Coupling and Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance in n-type PbTe-Cu2Se via Dynamic Phase Conversion. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203325
-
Zhao, X. B., Ji, X. H., Zhang, Y. H., Zhu, T. J., Tu, J. P., & Zhang, X. B. (2005). Bismuth telluride nanotubes and the effects on the thermoelectric properties of nanotube-containing nanocomposites. Applied Physics Letters, 86(6), 062111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1863440
-
Zhao, Y., Dyck, J. S., & Burda, C. (2011). Toward high-performance nanostructured thermoelectric materials: the progress of bottom-up solution chemistry approaches. J. Mater. Chem., 21(43), 17049-17058. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM11727K
-
Zhang, Q., Liao, B., Lan, Y., Lukas, K., Liu, W., Esfarjani, K., Opeil, C., Broido, D., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2013). High thermoelectric performance by resonant dopant indium in nanostructured SnTe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110(33), 13261-13266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305735110
-
Zhao, LD., Lo, SH., Zhang, Y. et al. Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. Nature 508, 373–377 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13184
-
Heremans, J. P., Thrush, C. M., Morelli, D. T., & Wu, M. C. (2002). Thermoelectric Power of Bismuth Nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(21), 216801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.216801
-
Kim, W., Zide, J., Gossard, A., Klenov, D., Stemmer, S., Shakouri, A., & Majumdar, A. (2006). Thermal conductivity reduction and thermoelectric figure of merit increase by embedding nanoparticles in crystalline semiconductors. Physical review letters, 96(4), 045901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.045901
-
Joshi, G., Lee, H., Lan, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, G., Wang, D., Gould, R. W., Cuff, D. C., Tang, M. Y., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2008). Enhanced thermoelectric figure-of-merit in nanostructured p-type silicon germanium bulk alloys. Nano Lett., 8(12), 4670-4674. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8026795
-
Tan, G., Shi, F., Doak, J. W., Sun, H., Zhao, L. D., Wang, P., Uher, C., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V. P., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2015). Extraordinary role of Hg in enhancing the thermoelectric performance of p-type SnTe. Energy Environ. Sci., 8(1), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01463D
-
Hegde, G. S., Prabhu, A. N., Rao, A., & Babu, P. D. (2020). Enhancement of thermoelectric performance of In doped Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 compounds. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 584, 412087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.412087
-
Chere, E. K., Zhang, Q., McEnaney, K., Yao, M., Cao, F., Sun, J., Chen, S., Opeil, C., Chen, G., & Ren, Z. (2015). Enhancement of thermoelectric performance in n-type PbTe1−ySey by doping Cr and tuning Te:Se ratio. Nano Energy, 13, 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.026
-
Wang, H., Pei, Y., LaLonde, A. D., & Snyder, G. J. (2011). Heavily doped p-type PbSe with high thermoelectric performance: an alternative for PbTe. Adv Mater, 23(11), 1366-1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004200
-
Korkosz, R. J., Chasapis, T. C., Lo, S. H., Doak, J. W., Kim, Y. J., Wu, C. I., Hatzikraniotis, E., Hogan, T. P., Seidman, D. N., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V. P., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2014). High ZT in p-Type (PbTe)1–2x(PbSe)x(PbS)x Thermoelectric Materials. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136(8), 3225-3237. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4121583
-
Zhao, L.D., Tan, G., Hao, S., He, J., Pei, Y., Chi, H., Wang, H., Gong, S., Xu, H., Dravid, V.P., Uher, C., Snyder, G. J., Wolverton, C. & Kanatzidis, M.G. (2016). Ultrahigh power factor and thermoelectric performance in hole-doped single-crystal SnSe. Science, 351(6269), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3749
-
Wang, H., Lalonde, A. D., Pei, Y., & Snyder, G. J. (2013). The criteria for beneficial disorder in thermoelectric solid solutions. Advanced Functional Materials, 23(12), 1586-1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201201576
-
Zhang, X., & Zhao, L. D. (2015). Thermoelectric materials: Energy conversion between heat and electricity. Journal of Materiomics, 1(2), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2015.01.001
-
Zhang, Y., Jia, X., Sun, H., Sun, B., Liu, B., Liu, H., Kong, L., & Ma, H. (2016). Enhanced thermoelectric performance of nanostructured CNTs/BiSbTe bulk composite from rapid pressure-quenching induced multi-scale microstructure. Journal of Materiomics, 2(4), 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2016.08.002
-
Li, Y., Buddharaju, K., Singh, N., & Lee, S. J. (2012). Top-Down Silicon Nanowire-Based Thermoelectric Generator: Design and Characterization. Journal of Electronic Materials, 41(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-012-1901-4