Skip to content

Update UTxOState in UTXO rather than UTXOS #5557

Open
teodanciu wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
td/update-utxostate-in-utxo-rule
Open

Update UTxOState in UTXO rather than UTXOS #5557
teodanciu wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
td/update-utxostate-in-utxo-rule

Conversation

@teodanciu
Copy link
Contributor

@teodanciu teodanciu commented Feb 3, 2026

Description

At the moment, changes to the UTxOState are done in the UTXOS rule - even though the UTXOS rule doesn't actually produce anything to change the state.

In this PR, I'm updating UTXOS and UTXO rules for each era to update the state in UTXO.

Closes #5554

Checklist

  • Commits in meaningful sequence and with useful messages.
  • Tests added or updated when needed.
  • CHANGELOG.md files updated for packages with externally visible changes.
    NOTE: New section is never added with the code changes. (See RELEASING.md).
  • Versions updated in .cabal and CHANGELOG.md files when necessary, according to the
    versioning process.
  • Version bounds in .cabal files updated when necessary.
    NOTE: If bounds change in a cabal file, that package itself must have a version increase. (See RELEASING.md).
  • Code formatted (use scripts/fourmolize.sh).
  • Cabal files formatted (use scripts/cabal-format.sh).
  • CDDL files are up to date (use scripts/gen-cddl.sh)
  • hie.yaml updated (use scripts/gen-hie.sh).
  • Self-reviewed the diff.

@teodanciu teodanciu force-pushed the td/update-utxostate-in-utxo-rule branch 4 times, most recently from aaa38eb to a11db49 Compare February 4, 2026 17:51
@teodanciu teodanciu marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2026 20:33
@teodanciu teodanciu requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2026 20:33
@teodanciu teodanciu force-pushed the td/update-utxostate-in-utxo-rule branch from a11db49 to d609fab Compare February 4, 2026 20:35
@teodanciu teodanciu force-pushed the td/update-utxostate-in-utxo-rule branch from d609fab to 64828b9 Compare February 5, 2026 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update UtxoState in UTXO rule rather than in UTXOS rule

1 participant