Skip to content

Conversation

@alexanderpann
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexanderpann alexanderpann commented Nov 20, 2025

The only exception for if blocks are optional cells where I couldn't implement the necessary logic. Please check closely. Those changes could be very breaking. What has to be checked is that we don't generate any unnecessary new cells that might break existing code.

@alexanderpann alexanderpann marked this pull request as draft November 21, 2025 06:26
@alexanderpann alexanderpann force-pushed the feature/grammarcells_more_supported_standard_options branch from ae52a38 to af633c2 Compare November 21, 2025 06:35
@alexanderpann alexanderpann force-pushed the feature/grammarcells_more_supported_standard_options branch from af633c2 to 226a14d Compare November 21, 2025 06:55
@alexanderpann alexanderpann force-pushed the feature/grammarcells_more_supported_standard_options branch from 226a14d to 5f534e6 Compare November 21, 2025 11:23
@alexanderpann alexanderpann marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 11:24
@alexanderpann alexanderpann requested review from AtanasM98 and removed request for sergej-koscejev and wsafonov November 25, 2025 10:56
@sergej-koscejev sergej-koscejev self-requested a review November 27, 2025 11:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@sergej-koscejev sergej-koscejev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks for implementing this.

@alexanderpann alexanderpann merged commit 840937a into maintenance/mps20251 Nov 27, 2025
2 checks passed
@alexanderpann alexanderpann deleted the feature/grammarcells_more_supported_standard_options branch November 27, 2025 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants