-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Bump LLVM to v20 #58142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Bump LLVM to v20 #58142
Conversation
This reverts commit ca5d922.
Good news: Julia unit tests already pass! Only issues at the moment are
|
I guess the asan issue was not in fact fixed upstream Lines 1989 to 1999 in 37a7541
|
We should try and get this fixed upstream
@nanosoldier |
Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. |
Seems to be usual mixed bag of regressions and improvements, but with no major regressions for once. And SIMD benchmarks appear to have some significant boost. |
Can't think of an easy way to make the change to the gc push pop test (88a55e9) compatible with llvm <= 19.
#include <stddef.h>
int test(size_t nel, size_t elsz) {
size_t nbytes;
int overflow = __builtin_mul_overflow(nel, elsz, &nbytes);
int overflow2 = __builtin_add_overflow(nel, nbytes, &nbytes);
return overflow * overflow2;
}
|
It seems like it was ub in the first place, ig we need to wait for https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2024/12/11/making-memcpynull-null-0-well-defined to land
Last static analyzer failure seems to be it complaining that Lines 289 to 306 in da99461
Called from Lines 1384 to 1394 in da99461
Lines 1298 to 1321 in da99461
doublesplit != 0
|
No description provided.