[backports-release-1.10] Bump llvm 15 to 15.0.7+11#61093
[backports-release-1.10] Bump llvm 15 to 15.0.7+11#61093christiangnrd wants to merge 4 commits intoJuliaLang:backports-release-1.10from
Conversation
1c1f7a9 to
ed956c8
Compare
|
@christiangnrd @gbaraldi Any idea why |
|
I see some 404s @christiangnrd did you build all the dependent libs? (clang etc |
ed956c8 to
73e5705
Compare
I'm pretty sure I did. This PR is based off of #52405. I noticed 2 things. Firstly, for some reason some symlinks aren't created with the newer clang, but I wouldn't know where to start looking for why: ChrichriMBP:~/Projects/julia$ diff clang+10.txt clang+11.txt
8d7
< lrwxrwxrwx 1 christian christian 5 Feb 22 11:27 clang++ -> clang
13,14d11
< lrwxrwxrwx 1 christian christian 5 Feb 22 11:27 clang-cl -> clang
< lrwxrwxrwx 1 christian christian 5 Feb 22 11:27 clang-cpp -> clang
37,38d33
< -rwxr-xr-x 1 christian christian 23K Feb 22 11:27 git-clang-format
< -rwxr-xr-x 1 christian christian 9.8K Feb 22 11:27 hmaptool
118d112
< -rwxr-xr-x 1 christian christian 15K Feb 22 11:27 run-clang-tidySecondly, it seems like the cxx03 versions of the libraries I built on yggdrasil never got built. Maybe that has something to do with it? |
|
the cxx03 thing I think is because we disabled those targets by default cc @giordano. God these builds bitrot fast. You can check the difference in the common.jl since the last build happened and now. |
|
I would check if llvm_full_jll has the symlinks and we failed to copy to the dependent jlls or if the original full build already doesn't have them (they might be in bin instead of tools and vice versa) I seem to remember issues like these. |
Very crude formatting, but seems like my build is fully missing the symlinks, and some tools from bin aren't properly copied over? DetailsChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "clang++"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/tools/clang++
ChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "clang-cl"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/tools/clang-cl
ChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "clang-cpp"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/tools/clang-cpp
ChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "git-clang-format"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+11)/bin/git-clang-format
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/bin/git-clang-format
ChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "hmaptool"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/tools/hmaptool
ChrichriMBP:~/Downloads$ find . -name "run-clang-tidy"
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+11)/bin/run-clang-tidy
./LLVM_full.v15.0.7.aarch64-apple-darwin(+10)/bin/run-clang-tidyRelated to the missing symlinks, I found JuliaPackaging/Yggdrasil#8050. Is it possible that the cause is that As for the cxx03 stuff, seems like I'm the first one to trigger a build of LLVM since JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilderBase.jl#446. Not sure what the best way to proceed since I don't fully understand if those builds are still needed, and if so if they're only needed for llvm 15 builds or all llvm builds, etc. |
|
I wouldn't worry about the cxx stuff |
|
Yeah, I'd be curious to meet people who build Julia v1.10 from source with GCC 4.8. I don't even know whether that's possible at all. |
|
JuliaRegistries/General#149248 and JuliaRegistries/General#149248 encountered automerge issues :/ I left comments with how I think they can be fixed because suggestions didn't work very well last time. Would anyone with merge permission be able to help me resolve these? There's also JuliaRegistries/General#149249 which I believe requires the same fix as the LLVM_jll pr but that one isn't relevant for this PR |
73e5705 to
af9dd8d
Compare
|
@giordano Would you be able to look at the General registry PRs mentioned above? I imagine the fixes need to be applied in Yggdrasil (not General). |
|
Is there any way to update the minimum julia compat version from Yggdrasil without having to rebuild everything? Edit: found it. I opened JuliaPackaging/Yggdrasil#13225 so potential future builds (hopefully not) don't have issues with registration. |
|
I think these failures are spurious could someone take a look and restart them if they agree? |
|
I restarted the failing jobs |
|
All green! |
|
@gbaraldi Is this good to merge? |
I can't reopen #60968 so new PR.
This should allow LTS julia to be built on newer macos versions. I also snuck in a whitespace fix. Close #58890