Skip to content

New package: RigidtyTheoryTools v0.0.1 #132171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

Basic Rigidity Theory tools, including frameworks, infinitesimal rigidity and pure condition of graphs.

UUID: 1c4ebe1-5f12-4e11-a90a-70d228894cd0
Repo: https://github.com/Saschobolt/RigidityTheoryTools.jl.git
Tree: bbbb64aa8bb2d4706389010b503527f85f5df1f0

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines which are not met ❌

  • Repo URL does not end with /name.jl.git, where name is the package name

  • The following dependencies do not have a [compat] entry that is upper-bounded and only includes a finite number of breaking releases: AbstractAlgebra, BracketAlgebras, Combinatorics, GraphMakie, Graphs

    Extended explanation

    Your package has a Project.toml file which might look something like the following:

    name = "YourPackage"
    uuid = "random id"
    authors = ["Author Names"]
    version = "major.minor"
    
    [deps]
    # Package dependencies
    # ...
    
    [compat]
    # ...

    Every package listed in [deps], along with julia itself, must also be listed under [compat] (if you don't have a [compat] section, make one!). See the Pkg docs for the syntax for compatibility bounds, and this documentation for more on the kinds of compat bounds required for AutoMerge.

3. Needs action: here's what to do next

  1. Please try to update your package to conform to these guidelines. The General registry's README has an FAQ that can help figure out how to do so.
  2. After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simply retrigger Registrator, the same way you did in the initial registration. This will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number).

If you need help fixing the AutoMerge issues, or want your pull request to be manually merged instead, please post a comment explaining what you need help with or why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the #pkg-registration channel in the public Julia Slack for better visibility.

4. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@MasonProtter
Copy link
Contributor

MasonProtter commented Jun 2, 2025

This package doesn't have a Readme, a description, tests, nor documentation, making it seem unlikely that anyone other than the author would be able to actually use it for anything.

Generally, the registry is not for personal projects and is instead for sharing software for other people to be able to actually use. If this is meant for distribution to other people, could you please add at least a README with some usage instructions?

@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Jun 2, 2025

Note the typo "Rigidity" → "Rigidty". But also, could you add a little bit of documentation before registering? At the very least, that would be a description of the package's purpose and a small usage example in the README. An important part of packages in General is that any potential user can figure out what the package is about and how to get started with using it. That is really difficult when there is no documentation.

In the longer term, I definitely recommend setting up a Documenter-based documentation. Before a v1.0 release, or for smaller packages that can be effectively described entirely with their README, that's not a requirement, though.

I would not recommend registering a package a v0.0.1. The minimum version of a package registration is really v0.1.0, to indicate that it's useable. Until a package is sufficiently mature to be useful to a wide audience, and if you need the package to be registered for other reasons (development workflows), you should use a LocalRegistry instead.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot added the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Jun 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. new package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants