Support GHC 9.12.1 #39
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to the changed type of
GHC.mkNamePprCtxForModule(introduced in https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/commit/c5d89412dd21a428709c00499dfa611312ad4735) we need to add an own version of it in the compatibility layer.I also added an explicit export list for
PrintApi.CLI.Cmd.Dumpsuch that only the functions needed by the executables are exported: The motivation for this is a more stable API of that module, and to hide changes to the internals like the changed type of theextractModuleDeclarationsfunction. Please let me know if that is too restrictive.