Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update(docs): improve Jest cookbook and troubleshooting for coverage #228

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

ArturT
Copy link
Member

@ArturT ArturT commented Jan 17, 2025

  • Clarify Generate code coverage reports for jest
  • Add Missing Jest coverage data to troubleshooting

* Clarify Generate code coverage reports for jest
* Add  Missing Jest coverage data to troubleshooting
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we include a similar sentence in the other runners?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No because there are no examples of code coverage for Cypress & Vitest.

@ArturT ArturT merged commit 7803500 into main Jan 17, 2025
1 check passed
@ArturT ArturT deleted the improve-docs branch January 17, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants