Clarifying incorrect term "Coroutine interceptor" → "Continuation Interceptor" #420
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tionInterceptor "Coroutine interceptor" is not an official Kotlin term and may cause confusion. This patch corrects it to "ContinuationInterceptor" in the "Cooperative single-thread multitasking" section to match the actual API name.
easternkite
changed the title
Member
|
Thanks, merged manually |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request fixes a terminology inaccuracy in the documentation.
Before:
"Coroutine interceptor provides a straightforward tool..."
After:
"Continuation Interceptor provides a straightforward tool..."
In Kotlin Coroutines, Continuation Interceptor is the correct and official term used to describe a CoroutineContext.Element that intercepts coroutine resumptions. The phrase "coroutine interceptor" is imprecise and does not correspond to any actual type or interface in the Kotlin standard library. This change improves clarity and consistency with Kotlin's coroutine terminology.