Skip to content
Open
16 changes: 13 additions & 3 deletions kotlinx-coroutines-core/common/src/flow/internal/ChannelFlow.kt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -109,14 +109,24 @@ public abstract class ChannelFlow<T>(
* For non-atomic start it is possible to observe the situation,
* where the pipeline after the [flowOn] call successfully executes (mostly, its `onCompletion`)
* handlers, while the pipeline before does not, because it was cancelled during its dispatch.
* Thus `onCompletion` and `finally` blocks won't be executed and it may lead to a different kinds of memory leaks.
* Thus `onCompletion` and `finally` blocks won't be executed, and it may lead to a different kind of memory leaks.
*/
public open fun produceImpl(scope: CoroutineScope): ReceiveChannel<T> =
scope.produce(context, produceCapacity, onBufferOverflow, start = CoroutineStart.ATOMIC, block = collectToFun)
produceImplInternal(scope, CoroutineStart.ATOMIC)

internal open fun produceImplInternal(scope: CoroutineScope, start: CoroutineStart): ReceiveChannel<T> =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably shouldn't be open, there is a single implementation of this method

scope.produce(context, produceCapacity, onBufferOverflow, start = start, block = collectToFun)

override suspend fun collect(collector: FlowCollector<T>): Unit =
coroutineScope {
collector.emitAll(produceImpl(this))
// If upstream and collect have the same dispatcher, launch the `produce` coroutine undispatched.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, produceImpl called markConsumed, but now it is no longer the case. ChannelAsFlow.collect mentions it explicitly.
Probably can be broken by a double collection

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

val channel = Channel<Int>(1).also { it.send(1) }
val flow = channel.consumeAsFlow().buffer()
launch { flow.collect() }
channel.close()
flow.collect()

Something like this should fail, but it does not, so I assume this is a regression.
Ditto for collecting non-closing channel, it probably hangs instead of failing fast

// This allows the collector to reliably subscribe to the flow before it starts emitting.
val current = currentCoroutineContext()[ContinuationInterceptor]
val desired = context[ContinuationInterceptor]
val start = if (desired == null || desired == current) {
CoroutineStart.UNDISPATCHED
} else CoroutineStart.ATOMIC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider using a consistent code style.

We have some legacy places where one branch is wrapped into braces while another is not, but it's rather confusing than intentional

collector.emitAll(produceImplInternal(this, start))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another problem:

produceImpl was overridden in inheritors, produceImplInternal is not, so any behavioural divergence might result in a user-visible regression.

For example, .merge().conflate() chain now behaves differently, depending on whether it is collected or produceIn'd because they handle onBufferOverflow differently.

}

protected open fun additionalToStringProps(): String? = null
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions kotlinx-coroutines-core/common/test/channels/ProduceTest.kt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
package kotlinx.coroutines.channels

import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlin.coroutines.*
import kotlin.test.*

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ class ProduceTest : TestBase() {
try {
c.receive()
expectUnreached()
} catch (e: TestCancellationException) {
} catch (_: TestCancellationException) {
expect(5)
}
yield() // to produce
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ class ProduceTest : TestBase() {
assertFailsWith<IllegalStateException> { (channel as ProducerScope<*>).awaitClose() }
callbackFlow<Unit> {
expect(1)
launch {
launch(start = CoroutineStart.UNDISPATCHED) {
expect(2)
assertFailsWith<IllegalStateException> {
awaitClose { expectUnreached() }
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ class ProduceTest : TestBase() {
produced.cancel()
try {
source.receive()
} catch (e: CancellationException) {
} catch (_: CancellationException) {
finish(4)
}
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
package kotlinx.coroutines.flow

import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.channels.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlin.test.*

class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
Expand All @@ -20,10 +20,9 @@ class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
fun testBuffer() = runTest {
val flow = channelFlow {
assertTrue(trySend(1).isSuccess)
assertTrue(trySend(2).isSuccess)
assertFalse(trySend(3).isSuccess)
assertFalse(trySend(2).isSuccess)
}.buffer(1)
assertEquals(listOf(1, 2), flow.toList())
assertEquals(listOf(1), flow.toList())
}

@Test
Expand All @@ -34,7 +33,7 @@ class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
assertTrue(trySend(3).isSuccess)
assertTrue(trySend(4).isSuccess)
}.buffer(Channel.CONFLATED)
assertEquals(listOf(1, 4), flow.toList()) // two elements in the middle got conflated
assertEquals(listOf(4), flow.toList())
}

@Test
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -164,14 +163,13 @@ class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
val flow = channelFlow {
// ~ callback-based API, no children
outerScope.launch(Job()) {
expect(2)
send(1)
expectUnreached()
}
expect(1)
}
assertEquals(emptyList(), flow.toList())
finish(3)
finish(2)
}

@Test
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -206,13 +204,12 @@ class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
}

@Test
fun testDoesntDispatchWhenUnnecessarilyWhenCollected() = runTest {
fun testDoesntDispatchUnnecessarilyWhenCollected() = runTest {
// Test that `.collectLatest` consistently subscribes to the flow when invoked on the same dispatcher as upstream.
expect(1)
var subscribed = false
val myFlow = flow<Int> {
expect(3)
subscribed = true
yield()
yield() // In other words, testing that this will be the first suspension point in `collectLatest`.
expect(5)
}
launch(start = CoroutineStart.UNDISPATCHED) {
Expand All @@ -223,6 +220,21 @@ class ChannelFlowTest : TestBase() {
finish(6)
}
expect(4)
assertTrue(subscribed)
}

@Test
fun testDispatchesToDifferentDispatcherWhenCollected() = runTest {
expect(1)
val myFlow = flow<Int> {
expect(4)
}.flowOn(wrapperDispatcher())
launch(start = CoroutineStart.UNDISPATCHED) {
expect(2)
myFlow.collectLatest {
expectUnreached()
}
finish(5)
}
expect(3)
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@

package kotlinx.coroutines.flow

import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.channels.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*

@murfel murfel Aug 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated: L1: Do we need the suppression on Line 1? I don't quite understand how it is relevant here.

import kotlin.test.*

class FlowCallbackTest : TestBase() {
Expand All @@ -14,24 +14,25 @@ class FlowCallbackTest : TestBase() {
val flow = callbackFlow {
// ~ callback-based API
outerScope.launch(Job()) {
expect(2)
try {
expect(4)
send(1)
expectUnreached()
} catch (e: IllegalStateException) {
expect(3)
expect(5)
assertTrue(e.message!!.contains("awaitClose"))
}
finish(6)
}
expect(1)
}
try {
flow.collect()
} catch (e: IllegalStateException) {
expect(4)
expect(2)
assertTrue(e.message!!.contains("awaitClose"))
}
finish(5)
expect(3)
}

@Test
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
package kotlinx.coroutines.flow

import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.channels.*
import kotlinx.coroutines.testing.*
import kotlin.test.*

/**
* A _behavioral_ test for conflation options that can be configured by the [buffer] operator to test that it is
* implemented properly and that adjacent [buffer] calls are fused properly.
*/
*/
class BufferConflationTest : TestBase() {
private val n = 100 // number of elements to emit for test

Expand All @@ -20,8 +19,8 @@ class BufferConflationTest : TestBase() {
expect(1)
// emit all and conflate, then collect first & last
val expectedList = when (onBufferOverflow) {
BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST -> listOf(0) + (n - capacity until n).toList() // first item & capacity last ones
BufferOverflow.DROP_LATEST -> (0..capacity).toList() // first & capacity following ones
BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST -> (n - capacity until n).toList() // first item & capacity last ones
BufferOverflow.DROP_LATEST -> (0 until capacity).toList() // first & capacity following ones
else -> error("cannot happen")
}
flow {
Expand All @@ -38,6 +37,26 @@ class BufferConflationTest : TestBase() {
finish(n + 2 + expectedList.size)
}

@Test
fun testConflateExplicit() = runTest {
val n = 3
expect(1)
flow {
expect(2)
emit(0)
expect(3)
emit(1)
expect(4)
emit(2)
}
.conflate()
.collect { value ->
assertEquals(2, value)
expect(n + 2)
}
finish(n + 2 + 1)
}

@Test
fun testConflate() =
checkConflate(1) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -138,6 +157,6 @@ class BufferConflationTest : TestBase() {
fun testBuffer3DropOldestOverrideBuffer8DropLatest() =
checkConflate(3, BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST) {
buffer(8, onBufferOverflow = BufferOverflow.DROP_LATEST)
.buffer(3, BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST)
.buffer(3, BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST)
}
}
Loading