-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
[MAPPING] Adding a new RBF Utility inside the Mapping Application #13958
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
philbucher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@matekelemen any comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some documentation would be nice
|
TBH, I think we had the chance to implement more shapes to the RBF utilities in the core. I mean, by closing the other PR, and thus closing the discussion, to open this one you are IMO taking the quick (and suboptimal) path to merge. Nevertheless, this is not sufficient reason to block it. |
|
In my opinion, it makes sense to have this simple Interface in the MappingApplication for the need we have. As I said before, we are using this utility just as an Interface to evaluate RBFs, whereas the implementation in the core is doing the RBF Interpolation |
Description
This PR creates a new utility called
RadialBasisFunctionUtilitiesinside theMappingApplicationto include several additional Radial Basis Function (RBF) formulations commonly used for mapping in multi-physics applications (e.g., FSI coupling).Related PRs
#13917
#13934
FYI @rubenzorrilla, I will not modify the implementation in the core