Skip to content

feat(search): integrate MeiliSearch as a new search backend #826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wujunwei
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

integrate MeiliSearch as a new search backend for better cost-efficiency.

But, there are some limitation about meilisearch show as below:

  1. MeiliSearch do not support "group by" more than one field.
  2. MeiliSearch do not support Left Like, all Left Like will be replaced by CONTAINS.
  3. MeiliSearch do not support string compare, so SyncAt should translate to unix timestamp .

I have test it with many cases, but may still hide some bugs.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #773

@fanfan-yu
Copy link
Collaborator

Cool! Let me see later. By the way, some checks are failed which should be fixed.

@wujunwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

wujunwei commented Mar 24, 2025

Related PR KusionStack/charts#116

  • I will add more test cases in a few days.
  • Markdown Link Check failed looks like has nothing to do with my commit

@fanfan-yu
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, I have fixed the problem of markdown lint, you could rebase main branch to solve problem.

@elliotxx
Copy link
Collaborator

elliotxx commented Apr 2, 2025

@wujunwei I must say, this is truly an excellent job! However, quite a lot of code has been added, please give us some time to review the code and verify it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integration: Integration of Meilisearch as a Lightweight Search Engine Alternative
3 participants