docs: clarify 1-of-N auditor signature semantics - #1404
Conversation
4118e80 to
eaf3a02
Compare
| // single logical auditor entity. | ||
| // | ||
| // This behavior matches the semantics implemented by current token drivers. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please, remove this line so that the comments are bound to the function
adecaro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @sid200727 , sorry for the late review.
Thanks a lot for this clarification. It matches the current behavior.
Please, just remove the extra line and I'll merge.
eaf3a02 to
671ce6a
Compare
|
@sid200727 , there is still an extra new line before the comments and the function name. |
671ce6a to
0950c8e
Compare
bb1f542 to
90cffba
Compare
|
@sid200727 , I still see the extra line. Strange. What can it be? |
80b99ca to
f214dc5
Compare
|
Hi @sid200727 , could you check again my comment, please? |
|
Thanks for the reminder! I checked the comment again and verified that the documentation block is directly attached to the AuditingSignaturesValidate function without extra blank lines between the comment and the function. |
f214dc5 to
82bf7dc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Siddhi Khandelwal <siddhi.200727@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddhi Khandelwal <siddhi.200727@gmail.com>
82bf7dc to
f9fdb01
Compare
Summary
This PR clarifies the semantics of auditor signature validation in the token SDK.
Background
The current implementation follows a 1-of-N auditor signature policy:
The existing behavior was correct but not explicitly documented, which could lead to ambiguity when reviewing or extending the validator logic.
Changes
validator_auditing.goexplaining the current signature model.core-token.md.Impact
This PR does not change runtime behaviour.
It only documents the existing semantics to make the intended policy explicit.