Non-limber C_ells #42
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
is this PR still relevant as we do have the nonlimber in v3? or am i wrong? |
Collaborator
Author
|
I think it is, yes. Let me revisit it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Once the FKEM non-Limber branch has been merged, we should document its usage here, including how it should be used in the presence of different input power spectra (e.g. non-linear bias modes).
For now this is a draft PR that only contains a notebook in which I've copied an extended test script created by @paulrogozenski that shows how to use it in combination with PT calculators for non-linear bias. This needs to be properly cleaned up before merging.