Visualize deterministic RTL regression - #2
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 422c4555fb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] | ||
| OUTPUT = ROOT / "assets" / "rtl-regression.svg" | ||
| SCENARIOS = ((1, 40), (8, 200), (17, 100)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This hard-codes the same vec-len/random-cases values that are already defined by the CI run_regression steps I checked in .github/workflows/ci.yml, so --check only proves the SVG matches this duplicate tuple, not the checked-in CI workload described by the README. If someone changes a workflow regression case or adds/removes one, CI will still report the README evidence as up to date while the figure is stale; use a shared source or parse the workflow commands instead.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Adds a project-specific regression matrix generated from the checked-in verification cases and wires drift checking into CI. Validated with 10 Python tests, deterministic generation, and visual QA.