Skip to content

Aymeric wip#1033

Draft
N3ur0sis wants to merge 22 commits into
developfrom
aymeric-wip
Draft

Aymeric wip#1033
N3ur0sis wants to merge 22 commits into
developfrom
aymeric-wip

Conversation

@N3ur0sis
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Please provide a detailed description of what was done in this PR.
(And mentioned if linked to an issue docs)

Changes include

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • Other (for changes that might not fit in any category)

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it.

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it.

N3ur0sis added 22 commits April 20, 2026 15:10
Replay upstream develop changes as their own merge commit so local fuzzing fixes can stay reviewable on top.
Restore production source behavior to reduce PR drift while keeping the fuzz-only shims needed for local harness compatibility.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.43%. Comparing base (9cc25e0) to head (881bcf1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1033      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    59.83%   59.43%   -0.41%     
===========================================
  Files           26       26              
  Lines         2612     2655      +43     
  Branches       328      355      +27     
===========================================
+ Hits          1563     1578      +15     
- Misses         986     1073      +87     
+ Partials        63        4      -59     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 59.43% <ø> (-0.41%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026

elf sizes
source = source branch aymeric-wip
target = target branch develop

Device .text source .text target .text delta .bss source .bss target .bss delta max stack size source max stack size target max stack size delta
flex 182093 182093 0 21810 21810 0 15048 15048 0
apex_p 161945 161945 0 21810 21810 0 19144 19144 0
nanox 115539 115539 0 20536 20536 0 8192 8192 0
stax 182014 182014 0 21810 21810 0 15048 15048 0
nanos2 115811 115811 0 20508 20508 0 20448 20448 0

Stack consumption summary (clone_app_stack_consumption)

⚠️ This summary is for informative purpose only. It may not give the application actual worst case, for example if the test coverage is low.

Device Worst case (bytes) Remaining stack (bytes) Test
apex_p 1753 38599 test_clone.py::test_clone_thundercore[apex_p]
flex 1801 34455 test_clone.py::test_clone_thundercore[flex]
nanosp 1705 38647 test_clone.py::test_clone_thundercore[nanosp]
nanox 1697 6495 test_clone.py::test_clone_thundercore[nanox]
stax 1801 34455 test_clone.py::test_clone_thundercore[stax]

Full details

Stack consumption summary

⚠️ This summary is for informative purpose only. It may not give the application actual worst case, for example if the test coverage is low.

Device Worst case (bytes) Remaining stack (bytes) Test
apex_p 3193 15951 test_eip712.py::test_eip712_batch[apex_p]
flex 3193 11855 test_eip712.py::test_eip712_batch[flex]
nanosp 3193 17255 test_eip712.py::test_eip712_batch[nanosp]
nanox 3193 4999 test_eip712.py::test_eip712_batch[nanox]
stax 3193 11855 test_eip712.py::test_eip712_batch[stax]

Full details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants