Skip to content

chore(l10n): update translations #3582

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 135 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore(l10n): update translations #3582

wants to merge 135 commits into from

Conversation

LizardByte-bot
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.51%. Comparing base (bd359b2) to head (d4baa12).
Report is 70 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3582      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   11.61%   11.51%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines       17337    17499     +162     
  Branches     8100     8152      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits         2013     2015       +2     
- Misses      12833    12988     +155     
- Partials     2491     2496       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
Linux 11.14% <ø> (-0.15%) ⬇️
Windows 12.99% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/config.cpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher added this to the stable release milestone Jan 23, 2025
Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

1 similar comment
Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

1 similar comment
Copy link

Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 1, 2025

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

2 similar comments
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 1, 2025

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 1, 2025

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants