Skip to content

Conversation

@Ivorforce
Copy link
Contributor

@Ivorforce Ivorforce commented Nov 25, 2025

Modeled after wfdb_strptime (directly above).

I'm not sure if this is violating the spec, but it should be fairly unambiguous with this date format (moreso than the d/m/y format, which might be interpreted as m/d/y).

@Ivorforce
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just noticing that this change wouldn't work just yet because of the regex above. I'll wait for feedback before fixing that though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant